Peer-Review in a World with Rational Scientists : Toward Selection of the Average

@inproceedings{ThurnerPeerReviewIA,
  title={Peer-Review in a World with Rational Scientists : Toward Selection of the Average},
  author={Stefan Thurner and Rudolf Hanel}
}
SFI WORKING PAPER: 2010-09-016 SFI Working Papers contain accounts of scientific work of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the Santa Fe Institute. We accept papers intended for publication in peer-reviewed journals or proceedings volumes, but not papers that have already appeared in print. Except for papers by our external faculty, papers must be based on work done at SFI, inspired by an invited visit to or collaboration at SFI, or funded by an SFI grant. ©NOTICE: This… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.
33 Citations
13 References
Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 33 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 13 references

Einstein Versus the Physical Review

  • D. Kennefick
  • Physics Today 58
  • 2009

Editorial : Working double - blind : should there be author anonymity in peer review ?

  • T. Grove
  • Nature
  • 2008

Peer review: benefits, perceptions and alternatives

  • M. Ware
  • Publishing Research Consortium Summary Papers
  • 2008
1 Excerpt

Focal randomization: an optional mechanism for the evaluation of R&D projects

  • E. S. Brezis
  • Science and Public Policy
  • 2007
2 Excerpts

Quality and value: how can we get the best out of peer review

  • T. Grove
  • Nature (Nature Peer Review debate)
  • 2006
1 Excerpt

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…