Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals

@article{Wicherts2016PeerRQ,
  title={Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals},
  author={J. Wicherts},
  journal={PLoS ONE},
  year={2016},
  volume={11}
}
Background Recent controversies highlighting substandard peer review in Open Access (OA) and traditional (subscription) journals have increased the need for authors, funders, publishers, and institutions to assure quality of peer-review in academic journals. I propose that transparency of the peer-review process may be seen as an indicator of the quality of peer-review, and develop and validate a tool enabling different stakeholders to assess transparency of the peer-review process. Methods and… Expand
Peer review guidance: a primer for researchers
Open Science: A Review on Open Peer Review Literature
Peer review and preprint policies are unclear at most major journals
Peer review policies in medical student journals
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 42 REFERENCES
Measuring the quality of editorial peer review.
Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers
Views on the peer review system of biomedical journals: an online survey of academics from high-ranking universities
Author perception of peer review: impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction.
Letting the daylight in: Reviewing the reviewers and other ways to maximize transparency in science
...
1
2
3
4
5
...