Peculiar motions, accelerated expansion and the cosmological axis

@article{Tsagas2011PeculiarMA,
  title={Peculiar motions, accelerated expansion and the cosmological axis},
  author={Christos G. Tsagas},
  journal={Physical Review D},
  year={2011},
  volume={84},
  pages={063503}
}
  • C. Tsagas
  • Published 20 July 2011
  • Physics
  • Physical Review D
Peculiar velocities change the expansion rate of any observer moving relative to the smooth Hubble flow. As a result, observers in a galaxy like our Milky Way can experience accelerated expansion within a globally decelerating universe, even when the drift velocities are small. The effect is local, but the affected scales can be large enough to give the false impression that the whole cosmos has recently entered an accelerating phase. Generally, peculiar velocities are also associated with… Expand

Figures from this paper

Paper Mentions

Blog Post
Dark flows and the cosmological axis
Recent surveys indicate coherent large-scale peculiar motions, commonly referred to as ‘dark flows’, considerably stronger than expected. At the same time, an increasing number of reports suggest theExpand
Peculiar Raychaudhuri equation
Peculiar motions are commonplace in the universe. Our local group of galaxies, for example, drifts relative to the Hubble flow at about 600 km/sec. Such bulk flows are believed to fade away as weExpand
Evidence for anisotropy of cosmic acceleration
Observations reveal a “bulk flow” in the local Universe which is faster and extends to much larger scales than are expected around a typical observer in the standard ΛCDM cosmology. This is expectedExpand
The deceleration parameter in “tilted” Friedmann universes: Newtonian vs relativistic treatment
Although bulk peculiar motions are commonplace in the universe, most theoretical studies either bypass them, or take the viewpoint of the idealised Hubble-flow observers. As a result, the role ofExpand
Dark energy or local acceleration?
We find that an observer with a suitable acceleration relative to the frame comoving with the cosmic fluid, in the context of the FRW decelerating universe, measures the same cosmological redshift asExpand
Peculiar velocity measurement in a clumpy universe
In this work we address the issue of peculiar velocity measurement in a perturbed Friedmann universe using the deviations from measured luminosity distances of standard candles from background FRWExpand
Gravitationally influenced particle creation models and late-time cosmic acceleration
In this work we focus on the gravitationally influenced adiabatic particle creation process, a mechanism that does not need any dark energy or modified gravity models to explain the currentExpand
Dual universe and hyperboloidal relative velocity surface arising from extended special relativity
In two recent and completely independent articles (Hill and Cox in Proc R Soc A 468:4174, 2012; Vieira in Rev Bras Ensino F’s 34(3):1–15, 2012), the authors propose an extension of the LorentzExpand
DARK MATTER, A NEW PROOF OF THE PREDICTIVE POWER OF GENERAL RELATIVITY
Without observational or theoretical modifications, Newtonian and general relativity seem to be unable to explain gravitational behavior of large structure of the universe. The assumption of darkExpand
Supernovae as cosmological probes
The cosmological standard model at present is widely accepted as containing mainly things we do not understand. In particular the appearance of a Cosmological Constant, or dark energy, is puzzling.Expand
...
1
2
3
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 18 REFERENCES
Six Puzzles for LCDM Cosmology
Department of Physics, University of Ioannina, Greece(Dated: December 22, 2008)The ΛCDM cosmological model is a well defined, simple and predictive model which is consistentwith the majority ofExpand
Astrophys
  • J. 686, L49 (2008); A. Kashlinsky, F. Atrio-Barandela, D. Kocevski D and H. Ebeling, Astrophys. J. 691, 1479 (2009); A. Kashlinsky, F. Atrio-Barandela, H. Edeling, A. Edge and D. Kocevski, Astrophys. J. 712, L81
  • 2010
Mon
  • Not. R. Astron. Soc. 405, 503
  • 2010
Mon
  • Not. R. Astron. Soc. 323, 859 (2001); D.J. Schwarz and B. Weinhorst, Astron. & Astrophys. 474, 717 (2007); S. Gupta, T.D. Saini and T. Laskar, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 388, 242 (2008); R. Cooke and D. Lynden-Bell, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 401, 1409 (2010); I. Antoniou and L. Perivolaropoulos, JCAP
  • 2011
Astrophys
  • J. 709, 483
  • 2010
Phys
  • Rep. 465, 61
  • 2008
Astrophys
  • J. 649, 563 (2006); A. Shafieloo, V. Sahni and A.A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. D 80, 101301 (2009); A.C.C. Guimaraes and J.A.S. Lima, Class. Quantum Grav. 28, 125026
  • 2011
Classical Quantum Gravity 28
  • 164008 (2011); C. Clarkson and O. Umeh, , Classical Quantum Gravity 28, 164010 (2011). T. Clifton, Classical Quantum Gravity 28, 164011 (2011); E. Kolb, Classical Quantum Gravity 28, 164009 (2011); D. L. Wiltshire, Classical Quantum Gravity 28, 164006 (2011); T. Buchert, Classical Quantum Gravity 28
  • 2011
Astron
  • Astrophys. 353, 63 (2000); K. Tomita, Astrophys. J. 529, 26 (2000); J. W. Moffat, JCAP 0510, 012 (2005); H. Alnes, M. Amarzguioui and O. Gron, Phys. Rev. D 73, 083519 (2006); T. Biswas, R. Mansouri and A. Notari, JCAP 0712, 017 (2007); J.P. Uzan, C. Clarkson and G.F.R. Ellis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 1
  • 2010
Class
...
1
2
...