Peaceful dyads: A territorial perspective

  title={Peaceful dyads: A territorial perspective},
  author={Andrew P. Owsiak and John A. Vasquez},
  journal={International Interactions},
  pages={1040 - 1068}
ABSTRACT Many dyads develop peaceful relationships, avoiding war for long, historical periods. Are such dyads common? How many exist, and why have they never fought? This study provides a territorial perspective on peaceful dyads, defined as those that never fight a war over a given historical period. It compares two explanations for why peaceful dyads exist: the territorial peace and the democratic peace. A series of hypotheses test the relative ability of these two theories to account for… 


Settled Borders and Regime Type: Democratic Transitions as Consequences of Peaceful Territorial Transfers
Research arguing that external threats determine regime type has generally failed to provide systematic evidence in favor of the peace-to-democracy hypothesis. We suspect that the lack of
Foundations for integrating the democratic and territorial peace arguments
The democratic and territorial peace arguments explain interstate peace via distinct mechanisms. Yet they can be integrated. I theoretically derive both the unique domains in which each argument
Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946-1986
Democratic states are in general about as conflict- and war-prone as nondemocracies, but democracies have rarely clashed with one another in violent conflict. We first show that democracy, as well as
Economic Interdependence: A Path to Peace or a Source of Interstate Conflict?
This article investigates the long-standing liberal hypothesis that trade ties facilitate interstate peace. Rather than assuming that trade will always promote peace, the author highlights the need
Great Powers, Hierarchy, and Endogenous Regimes: Rethinking the Domestic Causes of Peace
  • P. McDonald
  • Political Science
    International Organization
  • 2015
Abstract This paper blends recent research on hierarchy and democratization to examine the theoretical and empirical costs of treating regime type exogenously in the literature most identified with
Between Dispute and War: The Effect of Joint Democracy on Interstate Conflict Escalation
  • P. Senese
  • Political Science
    The Journal of Politics
  • 1997
The "democratic peace" postulate has received much theoretical and empirical attention recently, with the bulk of the evidence coming down in support of its expectations: that democratic pairs of
Contiguous States, Stable Borders and the Peace between Democracies
Park and Colaresi find that border stability does not apply to non-contiguous states. This just confirms, again, an argument I have been making in numerous publications since my original “Bordering
The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory
Democratic peace theory is probably the most powerful liberal contribution to the debate on the causes of war and peace. In this paper I examine the causal logics that underpin the theory to
The Social Market Roots of Democratic Peace
Democracy does not cause peace among nations. Rather, domestic conditions cause both democracy and peace. From 1961 to 2001, democratic nations engaged in numerous fatal conflicts with each other,
Signing Up for Peace: International Boundary Agreements, Democracy, and Militarized Interstate Conflict
Can states usher in more peaceful relations with their neighbors by signing agreements that delineate their territorial boundaries? Theory suggests such a possibility, but the empirical evidence to