Peaceful Parties and Puzzling Personalists

@article{Peceny2003PeacefulPA,
  title={Peaceful Parties and Puzzling Personalists},
  author={Mark Peceny and Caroline C. Beer},
  journal={American Political Science Review},
  year={2003},
  volume={97},
  pages={339 - 342}
}
Reiter and Stam advance the study of the conflict behavior of authoritarian regimes in two ways. First, they clearly demonstrate the importance of using directed dyad data sets for studying mixed pairs of political regimes. Second, they have refocused our attention on the question of decisional constraints and international conflict. This response examines the dispute patterns of a specific mixed pair of authoritarian regimes, single-party regimes, and personalist dictatorships. We find that… 
Strongmen and Straw Men: Authoritarian Regimes and the Initiation of International Conflict
How do domestic institutions affect autocratic leaders’ decisions to initiate military conflicts? Contrary to the conventional wisdom, I argue that institutions in some kinds of dictatorships allow
Strongmen and Straw Men: Authoritarian Regimes and the Initiation of International Conflict
How do domestic institutions affect autocratic leaders’ decisions to initiate military conflicts? Contrary to the conventional wisdom, I argue that institutions in some kinds of dictatorships allow
Environmental Interest Groups and Authoritarian Regime Diversity
Abstract The literature increasingly disaggregates political systems for examining the differences in international policies and domestic decision-making according to diverse regime typologies. The
Democratic Breakdown and the Hidden Perils of the Democratic Peace
One empirical regularity in International Relations appears consistent: democracies rarely fight one another. However, this article maintains that the democratic peace comes with hidden costs.
Hawkish Partisans: How Political Parties Shape Nationalist Conflicts in China and Japan
Abstract It is well known that regime types affect international conflicts. This article explores political parties as a mechanism through which they do so. Political parties operate in fundamentally
Regime Type, the Fate of Leaders, and War
We propose and test a formal model of war and domestic politics, building on recent evidence on the relationship between regime type, the effect of war on the probability of losing office, and the
Accountable for what? Regime types, performance, and the fate of outgoing dictators, 1946–2004
For some political leaders losing power might entail further punishment than just being replaced. During the period 1946–2004, 47% of dictators have been jailed, killed, or had to go into exile as a
Authoritarian regimes and civil–military relations: Explaining counterbalancing in autocracies
How do autocracies structure their civil–military relations? We contend that personalist dictators are more strongly associated with counterbalancing than other authoritarian regime types.
Authoritarian Breakdown in the Arab World: Linkages, Leverage and Regime Type
Scholars (see Levitsky and Way, 2005) have highlighted the importance of linkages and leverage in facilitating authoritarian breakdown. By linkages, we are referring to the ties that authoritarian
The Effects of Autocratic Characteristics on Public Opinion toward Democracy Promotion Policies: A Conjoint Analysis
Does the level of public support for democracy promotion policies vary with the characteristics of potential autocratic targets? We conduct an experimental study with a conjoint design on a sample
...
1
2
3
4
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 11 REFERENCES
Dictatorial Peace?
Is there a dictatorial peace that resembles the democratic peace? This paper uses a new data set compiled by Barbara Geddes to examine the conflict behavior of three types of autocratic
Authoritarian Breakdown : Empirical Test of a Game Theoretic Argument
This paper continues a project on the links between different authoritarian institutional structures and the likelihood and mode of transition to democracy. In earlier work, I have argued that
Identifying the Culprit: Democracy, Dictatorship, and Dispute Initiation
Peceny, Beer, and Sanchez-Terry (2002) find that interstate dyads containing a democracy and a personalist dictatorship are more likely than other types of dyads to experience militarized disputes.
War and the Survival of Political Leaders: A Comparative Study of Regime Types and Political Accountability
We seek to answer the question, What effect does international war participation have on the ability of political leaders to survive in office? We develop a model of political reliability and derive
An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace
We examine formally the link between domestic political institutions and policy choices in the context of eight empirical regularities that constitute the democratic peace. We demonstrate that
Powerful Pacifists: Democratic States and War.
Democracies are less likely to fight wars with each other. They are also more likely to prevail in wars with autocratic states. I offer an explanation of this syndrome of powerful pacifism drawn from
Democracies at War
DOMESTIC POLITICAL AUDIENCES AND THE ESCALATION OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES
International crises are modeled as a political “war of attrition†in which state leaders choose at each moment whether to attack, back down, or escalate. A leader who backs down suffers audience
Elections and War: The Electoral Incentive in the Democratic Politics of War and Peace
book. Flint has organized the book into three sections: Foundation of Understanding Geographies of War and Peace, Geographies of War and Geographies of Peace. The foundation section presents an
Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy
1. Introduction Part I. Theory: 2. Information and signalling in international crises 3. Democratic politics in international crises 4. Domestic competition and signalling in international crises
...
1
2
...