Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system

@article{Zuckerman1971PatternsOE,
  title={Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system},
  author={Harriet Zuckerman and R. Merton},
  journal={Minerva},
  year={1971},
  volume={9},
  pages={66-100}
}
Chapter 6 The Professoriate in International Perspective
My aim in this chapter is to consolidate the growing literature on the international professoriate. This literature has burgeoned particularly over the past 15 years, which is a response to the
THE LIMITED EFFECTIVENESS OF PRESTIGE AS AN INTERVENTION ON THE HEALTH OF MEDICAL JOURNAL PUBLICATIONS
TLDR
It is argued that the publication bias literature in academic medicine demonstrates that editor interventions have had limited effectiveness in improving the health of the publication and trial registration record, suggesting that much stronger interventions are needed.
Using Social Network Analysis to Investigate Potential Bias in Editorial Peer Review in Core Journals of Comparative/International Education
USING SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS TO INVESTIGATE POTENTIAL BIAS IN EDITORIAL PEER REVIEW IN CORE JOURNALS OF COMPARATIVE/INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION
A Beauty Contest of Referee Processes of Economics Journals
Peer review influences decisively personal advancement, research opportunities, salaries, grant-funding, promotion, and tenure. It claims to exert quality control of manuscripts and improve them, to
Managing the Growth of Peer Review at the Royal Society Journals, 1865-1965
This article examines the evolution of peer review and the modern editorial processes of scholarly journals by analyzing a novel data set derived from the Royal Society’s archives and covering
An Investigation of How Black STEM Faculty at Historically Black Colleges and Universities Approach the National Science Foundation Merit Review Process
....................................................................................................................................... xiii Chapter
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review
TLDR
There is considerable scope for new peer review initiatives to be developed, each with their own potential issues and advantages, and a novel hybrid platform model is proposed that could resolve many of the socio-technical issues associated with peer review, and potentially disrupt the entire scholarly communication system.
Characterisation of academic journals in the digital age
TLDR
This study identifies and evaluates the journal characteristics reported in five databases and describes the 13 indicators (variables) that are available through these databases—scholarly impact, subject category, age, total articles, distribution medium, open access, peer review, acceptance rate, pricing, language, country, status, and issue frequency.
...
...