Patient versus healthcare professional spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting: a systematic review.

@article{Inch2012PatientVH,
  title={Patient versus healthcare professional spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting: a systematic review.},
  author={Jackie Inch and Margaret C Watson and Stella Anakwe-Umeh},
  journal={Drug safety},
  year={2012},
  volume={35 10},
  pages={807-18}
}
BACKGROUND Increasing numbers of national pharmacovigilance schemes are accepting adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports from patients. The extent to which patient ADR reports contribute to pharmacovigilance requires comparisons to be made with reports from healthcare professionals (HCPs). OBJECTIVE This systematic review was conducted to identify all comparative studies of patient and HCP ADR reports to national pharmacovigilance schemes. METHODS We conducted a systematic review (which… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 3 times over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 29 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 16 references

Reporting adverse drug reactions: a guide for healthcare professionals

  • C. George
  • London: British Medical Association,
  • 2006
Highly Influential
4 Excerpts

AERS reporting by healthcare providers and consumers by year [online

  • US FDA
  • Available from URL: www. fda.gov/Drugs…
  • 2011

Adverse reaction and incident reporting

  • Health Canada
  • 2010

MedWatch: The FDA safety information and adverse event reporting program [online

  • US FDA
  • Available from URL: http://www.fda.gov/Safety…
  • 2010

The Yellow Card Scheme: experience of patient reporting of adverse drug reaction since nationwide launch [abstract no. 221

  • PL Barrow, M Foy, S Gandhi
  • Drug Saf
  • 2009

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…