Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration

@inproceedings{Navarro2020PathsIS,
  title={Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration},
  author={Danielle Navarro},
  year={2020}
}
  • D. Navarro
  • Published 23 September 2020
  • Computer Science
This is an archived version of a blog post on preregistration. The first half of the post argues that there is not a strong justification for preregistration as a tool to solve problems with statistical inference (p-hacking); the second half argues that preregistration has a stronger justification as one tool (among many) that can aid scientists in documenting our projects. [Note that this archival version exists only because the blog itself no longer does, and as the original has been cited… Expand
Making ERP research more transparent: Guidelines for preregistration.
TLDR
An overview of the problems associated with undisclosed analytic flexibility is presented, why and how EEG researchers would benefit from adopting preregistration are discussed, and guidelines and examples on how to preregister data preprocessing and analysis steps in typical ERP studies are provided. Expand
Practical Methodological Reform Needs Good Theory
  • Will M. Gervais
  • Medicine
  • Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
  • 2021
In the face of unreplicable results, statistical anomalies, and outright fraud, introspection and changes in the psychological sciences have taken root. Vibrant reform and metascience movements haveExpand