Parallels and differences in the treatment of metaphor in relevance theory and cognitive linguistics *

@inproceedings{Wilson2010ParallelsAD,
  title={Parallels and differences in the treatment of metaphor in relevance theory and cognitive linguistics *},
  author={Deirdre B. Wilson},
  year={2010}
}
Both cognitive linguists and relevance theorists are developing original approaches to metaphor. Both shed new light on old debates and suggest fruitful directions for research. Although there has so far been little interaction between the two approaches, Raymond Gibbs and Markus Tendahl (2006, 2008) have recently begun to compare them and consider how they might be combined. This paper is intended as a contribution to that debate. After outlining some parallels and differences between the two… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 32 references

Creativity and Convention: The Pragmatics of Everyday Figurative Speech

R. Vega Moreno
theory. Journal of Pragmatics • 2007
View 8 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Sodian (eds) Young Children’s Cognitive Development, 95-130

B. Hengsteler
2009

Understanding of speaker certainty and false-belief

T. Matsui, H. Rakoczy, Y. Miura, M. Tomasello
2009

Burton-Roberts (ed.) Pragmatics, 230-259

N. concepts. In
2008

Metaphor and the ' Emergent Property ' Problem : A RelevanceTheoretic Approach

N. Burton-Roberts, D. Wilson, R. Carston
The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition , Logic and Communication [ Online ] • 2008

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…