Paper Plain: Making Medical Research Papers Approachable to Healthcare Consumers with Natural Language Processing

@article{August2022PaperPM,
  title={Paper Plain: Making Medical Research Papers Approachable to Healthcare Consumers with Natural Language Processing},
  author={Tal August and Lucy Lu Wang and Jonathan Bragg and Marti A. Hearst and Andrew Head and Kyle Lo},
  journal={ArXiv},
  year={2022},
  volume={abs/2203.00130}
}
When seeking information not covered in patient-friendly documents, like medical pamphlets, healthcare consumers may turn to the research literature. Reading medical papers, however, can be a challenging experience. To improve access to medical papers, we introduce a novel interactive interface—Paper Plain1—with four features powered by natural language processing: definitions of unfamiliar terms, in-situ plain language section summaries, a collection of key questions that guide readers to… 

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 109 REFERENCES

A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure

This paper presents a simple and widely ap- plicable multiple test procedure of the sequentially rejective type, i.e. hypotheses are rejected one at a tine until no further rejections can be done. It

Language Models are Few-Shot Learners

TLDR
GPT-3 achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation, question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic.

On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarization

TLDR
It is found that neural abstractive summarization models are highly prone to hallucinate content that is unfaithful to the input document and textual entailment measures better correlate with faithfulness than standard metrics, potentially leading the way to automatic evaluation metrics as well as training and decoding criteria.

Open to the public: paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing

TLDR
A critique of the current academic publishing ecosystem is outlined, a discussion of the open access debate from a public perspective is re-focused, and some of the arguments against public open access are responded to.

Internet information and medical consultations: experiences from patients' and physicians' perspectives.

Augmenting Scientific Papers with Just-in-Time, Position-Sensitive Definitions of Terms and Symbols

TLDR
This work introduces ScholarPhi, an augmented reading interface with four novel features: tooltips that surface position-sensitive definitions from elsewhere in a paper, a filter over the paper that “declutters” it to reveal how the term or symbol is used across the paper, automatic equation diagrams that expose multiple definitions in parallel, and an automatically generated glossary of important terms and symbols.

Automated Lay Language Summarization of Biomedical Scientific Reviews

TLDR
Analysis of the various challenges in performing the automated generation of lay language summaries of biomedical scientific reviews indicate that automatically generated summaries produced using contemporary neural architectures can achieve promising quality and readability as compared with references developed for the lay public by experts.

Talk to Papers: Bringing Neural Question Answering to Academic Search

TLDR
A large improvement over classic search engine baseline on several standard QA datasets is presented and the community is provided a collaborative data collection tool to curate the first natural language processing research QA dataset via a community effort.

Pre-trained Language Model for Biomedical Question Answering

TLDR
This paper investigates the performance of BioBERT, a pre-trained biomedical language model, in answering biomedical questions including factoid, list, and yes/no type questions.

Towards Personalized Descriptions of Scientific Concepts

TLDR
This paper proposes generating personalized scientific concept descriptions that are tailored to the user’s expertise and context and outlines a complete architecture for the task and releases an expert-annotated resource, ACCoRD.
...