Pancreatogastrostomy Versus Pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction After PANCreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC, DRKS 00000767): Perioperative and Long-term Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

@article{Keck2016PancreatogastrostomyVP,
  title={Pancreatogastrostomy Versus Pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction After PANCreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC, DRKS 00000767): Perioperative and Long-term Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.},
  author={Tobias Keck and Ulrich F Wellner and Marcus Bahra and Fritz Klein and Olivia Sick and Marco Niedergethmann and Torsten Johannes Wilhelm and Stefan A. Farkas and Thomas Boerner and Christiane J Bruns and Axel Kleespies and Joerg Kleeff and Andr{\'e} L Mihaljevic and Waldemar Uhl and A Chromik and Volker Fendrich and Kristin Heeger and Winfried Padberg and Andreas Hecker and Ulf Peter Neumann and Klaus Junge and J{\"o}rg Christoph Kalff and Tim R. Glowka and Jens Werner and Phillip Knebel and Pompiliu Piso and Max Mayr and J. Izbicki and Yogesh Kumar Vashist and Peter Bronsert and Thomas Bruckner and Ronald Limprecht and Markus K Diener and Inga Rossion and Inga Wegener and Ulrich Theodor Hopt},
  journal={Annals of surgery},
  year={2016},
  volume={263 3},
  pages={440-9}
}
OBJECTIVES To assess pancreatic fistula rate and secondary endpoints after pancreatogastrostomy (PG) versus pancreatojejunostomy (PJ) for reconstruction in pancreatoduodenectomy in the setting of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. BACKGROUND PJ and PG are established methods for reconstruction in pancreatoduodenectomy. Recent prospective trials suggest superiority of the PG regarding perioperative complications. METHODS A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial comparing… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 19 times over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS