PageRank as an Argumentation Semantics

@inproceedings{Albini2020PageRankAA,
  title={PageRank as an Argumentation Semantics},
  author={Emanuele Albini and Pietro Baroni and Antonio Rago and Francesca Toni},
  booktitle={COMMA},
  year={2020}
}

Argumentative XAI: A Survey

TLDR
This survey overviews the literature focusing on different types of explanation, different models with which argumentation-based explanations are deployed, different forms of delivery, and different argumentation frameworks they use, and lays out a roadmap for future work.

Explaining Causal Models with Argumentation: the Case of Bi-variate Reinforcement

TLDR
A conceptualisation for generating argumentation frameworks (AFs) from causal models for the purpose of forging explanations for the models’ outputs is introduced, based on reinterpreting desirable properties of semantics of AFs as explanation moulds, which are means for characterising the relations in the causal model argumentatively.

Forging Argumentative Explanations from Causal Models

TLDR
The conceptualisation is based on reinterpreting properties of semantics of AFs as explanation moulds, which are means for characterising argumentative relations, and shows how the extracted bipolar AFs may be used as relation-based explanations for the outputs of causal models.

Interpreting and explaining pagerank through argumentation semantics

TLDR
This paper proposes several types of argument-based explanations for PageRank, each of which focuses on different aspects of the algorithm and uncovers information useful for the comprehension of its results.

Explaining PageRank through Argumentation

TLDR
Re-interpreting PageRank as an argumentation semantics for a bipolar argumentation framework empowers its explainability and proposes several types of explanation, each of which focuses on different aspects of the algorithm and uncovers information useful for the comprehension of its results.