PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

@article{Tricco2018PRISMAEF,
  title={PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation},
  author={Andrea C. Tricco and Erin Lillie and Wasifa Zarin and Kelly Kathleen O’Brien and Heather L. Colquhoun and Danielle E. Levac and David Moher and Micah D. J. Peters and Tanya Horsley and Laura Weeks and Susanne Hempel and Elie A. Akl and Christine S Chang and Jessie McGowan and Lesley A Stewart and Lisa Hartling and Adrian Aldcroft and Michael G. Wilson and Chantelle Garritty and Simon Lewin and Christina M. Godfrey and Marilyn Macdonald and Etienne V. Langlois and Karla Soares-Weiser and Jo Moriarty and Tammy Clifford and zge Tunalp and Sharon E. Straus},
  journal={Annals of Internal Medicine},
  year={2018},
  volume={169},
  pages={467-473}
}
Scoping reviews can be conducted to meet various objectives. They may examine the extent (that is, size), range (variety), and nature (characteristics) of the evidence on a topic or question; determine the value of undertaking a systematic review; summarize findings from a body of knowledge that is heterogeneous in methods or discipline; or identify gaps in the literature to aid the planning and commissioning of future research (1, 2). A recent scoping review by members of our team suggested… Expand
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews
TLDR
The updated JBI guidance for scoping reviews includes additional guidance on several methodological issues, such as when a scoping review is (or is not) appropriate, and how to extract, analyze, and present results, and provides clarification for implications for practice and research. Expand
The importance and value of reporting guidance for scoping reviews: A rehabilitation science example
Objective: Scoping reviews use a systematic approach to synthesize a body of knowledge. The use of scoping review methodology is increasingly common. Despite recommendations to guide the conduct ofExpand
Scoping Reviews and Systematic Reviews: Is It an Either/Or Question?
TLDR
The guidance document clearly established the important role and contribution of scoping reviews and shines light on the essential ways in which scoped reviews differ from other systematic reviews. Expand
Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application
TLDR
The purpose of this paper is to provide readers with a concise source of information regarding the difference between scoped reviews and other review types, the reasons for undertaking scoping reviews, and an update on methodological guidance for the conduct and reporting of scoping Reviews. Expand
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach
TLDR
The purpose of this article is to clearly describe the differences in indications between scoping reviews and systematic reviews and to provide guidance for when a scoping review is (and is not) appropriate. Expand
Practical guidance for knowledge synthesis: Scoping Review Methods.
TLDR
Clarity is provided about what is meant by conceptual clarity and how pre-planning enables review authors to produce scoping reviews which are of high quality, reliability and readily publishable. Expand
PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
TLDR
The intent of PRISMA-S is to complement the PRISma Statement and its extensions by providing a checklist that could be used by interdisciplinary authors, editors, and peer reviewers to verify that each component of a search is completely reported and therefore reproducible. Expand
Methods for Research Evidence Synthesis: The Scoping Review Approach.
TLDR
A scoping review was used to identify information available in the literature on contributors to loss and theft of controlled drugs in hospitals and the safeguards that have been suggested to address these diversions. Expand
PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews*
TLDR
The intent of PRISMA-S is to complement the PRISma Statement and its extensions by providing a checklist that could be used by interdisciplinary authors, editors, and peer reviewers to verify that each component of a search is completely reported and, therefore, reproducible. Expand
Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions
Abstract Objectives Scoping reviews are being increasingly used by researchers. The objective of this article was to outline some challenges and potential solutions to improve the conduct andExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 39 REFERENCES
Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews
TLDR
The methodology and guidance for the conduct of systematic scoping reviews outlined below was developed by members of the JoAnna Briggs Institute and members of five Joanna Briggs Collaborating Centres. Expand
A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews
TLDR
The number of scoping reviews conducted per year has steadily increased since 2012, and in particular, there is need for a guideline to standardize reporting. Expand
Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting.
TLDR
Consistency in the proposed domains and methodologies of scoped reviews, along with the development of reporting guidance, will facilitate methodological advancement, reduce confusion, facilitate collaboration and improve knowledge translation of scoping review findings. Expand
Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework
This paper focuses on scoping studies, an approach to reviewing the literature which to date has received little attention in the research methods literature. We distinguish between different typesExpand
Advancing scoping study methodology: a web-based survey and consultation of perceptions on terminology, definition and methodological steps
TLDR
A cross-sectional web-based survey with clinicians, educators, researchers, knowledge users, representatives from community-based organizations, graduate students, and policy stakeholders with experience and/or interest in conducting scoping studies to gain an understanding of experiences and perspectives on the conduct and reporting of scoped studies. Expand
Scoping studies: advancing the methodology
TLDR
Specific recommendations to clarify and enhance this methodology are outlined for each stage of the Arksey and O'Malley framework, to support the advancement, application and relevance of scoping studies in health research. Expand
A scoping review of rapid review methods
TLDR
Numerous rapid review approaches were identified and few were used consistently in the literature; a prospective study comparing the results from rapid reviews to those obtained through systematic reviews is warranted. Expand
Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis.
TLDR
NMAs consistently scored the highest on the AMSTAR tool likely because the purpose is to estimate treatment effects statistically, and scoping reviews scored the lowest (even after adjusting the score for not relevant items) likely because of the purpose to characterize the literature. Expand
Characteristics and knowledge synthesis approach for 456 network meta-analyses: a scoping review
TLDR
The characteristics and methodological quality of knowledge synthesis approaches underlying the NMA process and the analytical process for NMAs are poorly reported and need improvement. Expand
PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement.
TLDR
The PRESS 2015 Guideline Statement should help to guide and improve the peer review of electronic literature search strategies and suggested that structured PRESS could identify search errors and improved the selection of search terms. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
...