Overconfidence and gender gaps in redistributive preferences: Cross-Country experimental evidence

@article{Buser2020OverconfidenceAG,
  title={Overconfidence and gender gaps in redistributive preferences: Cross-Country experimental evidence},
  author={Thomas Buser and Gianluca Grimalda and Louis Putterman and Joel J. van der Weele},
  journal={Journal of Economic Behavior \& Organization},
  year={2020}
}

Figures and Tables from this paper

Gender preference gaps and voting for redistribution
There is substantial evidence that women tend to support different policies and political candidates than men. Many studies also document gender differences in a variety of important preference
Fair Shares and Selective Attention
Attitudes towards fairness and redistribution differ along socio-economic lines, resulting in political conflict. To understand the formation of such views and find levers to affect them, we study
Attractiveness and preferences for redistribution.
  • A. Fazio
  • Economics
    Economics and human biology
  • 2022
Overconfidence, Income-Ability Gap, and Preferences for Income Equality
The overconfident, who do not actually earn what they think they can, may attribute such cognitive gap to the unfairness of the economy and become favorable of public redistribution when they realize
The Inequality Trap: How High Stakes Fuel Overestimation and Equity Aversion
Bringing existing inequality in South Africa (high) and Switzerland (low) to the lab, we study how people's preferences for redistribution change with the level of income inequality, income mobility,
Promoting justice through community-based research: International case studies.
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches to promoting justice focus on working from the ground up and giving a voice to marginalized communities regarding their concerns, potential
Preferences for redistribution
Individual characteristics associated with risk and time preferences: A multi country representative survey
This paper empirically analyzes how individual characteristics are associated with risk aversion, loss aversion, time discounting, and present bias. To this end, we conduct a large-scale
Beautiful Inequality: Are Beautiful People More Willing To Redistribute?
As winners of the “genetic lottery”, beautiful people have several advantages over their life course: they earn more, find better jobs, and are happier than their peers. We investigate whether

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 60 REFERENCES
Do Gender Preference Gaps Impact Policy Outcomes?
Many studies document systematic gender differences in a variety of important economic preferences, such as risk-taking, competition and pro-sociality. One potential implication of this literature is
Preferences and Biases in Educational Choices and Labor Market Expectations: Shrinking the Black Box of Gender
Standard observed characteristics explain only part of the differences between men and women in education choices and labor market trajectories. Using an experiment to derive students' levels of
Complexities of the Gender Gap
Gender differences in political attitudes among whites arise from a variety of sources that may vary from issue to issue. Explanations based on gender-based social roles, basic value differences,
Global Evidence on Economic Preferences
This paper studies the global variation in economic preferences. For this purpose, we present the Global Preference Survey (GPS), an experimentally validated survey dataset of time preference, risk
Biased Perceptions of Income Distribution and Preferences for Redistribution: Evidence from a Survey Experiment
Individual perceptions of income distribution play a vital role in political economy and public finance models, yet there is little evidence regarding their origins or accuracy. This study examines
The Developmental Theory of the Gender Gap: Women’s and Men’s Voting Behavior in Global Perspective
Studies carried out in many countries in previous decades found that women were more conservative than men and less likely to participate in politics. Here, it is examined whether this traditional
A Reconsideration of Gender Differences in Risk Attitudes
TLDR
The existing experimental literature is surveyed, finding that significance and magnitude of gender differences are task specific, and gender differences correlate with the presence of a safe option and fixed probabilities in the elicitation method.
Overconfidence and In-Group Effects in Preferences for Redistribution: An Experimental Study∗
Studies have documented that the economically successful generally favor less redistribution than the economically unsuccessful. We show that two behavioral elements, overconfidence in own ability
Fairness Views and Political Preferences - Evidence from a representative sample
We elicit distributional fairness ideals of impartial spectators using an incentivized elici- tation in a large and heterogeneous sample of the German population. We document several empirical facts:
...
...