Over-invasion by functionally equivalent invasive species.

  title={Over-invasion by functionally equivalent invasive species.},
  author={James C. Russell and Nurul S Sataruddin and Allison Heard},
  volume={95 8},
Multiple invasive species have now established at most locations around the world, and the rate of new species invasions and records of new invasive species continue to grow. Multiple invasive species interact in complex and unpredictable ways, altering their invasion success and impacts on biodiversity. Incumbent invasive species can be replaced by functionally similar invading species through competitive processes; however the generalized circumstances leading to such competitive displacement… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Competition between similar invasive species: modeling invasional interference across a landscape

A spatially-explicit model of two competing invaders suggests that invasional interference will lead to lower levels of each species when together, but a similar net level of thistle invasion due to the similarity of intra- and interspecific competition.

Whole community invasions and the integration of novel ecosystems

The impact of invasion by a single non-native species on the function and structure of ecological communities can be significant, and the effects can become more drastic–and harder to predict–when

Invasive rat interactions and over-invasion on a coral atoll.

Highly competitive native aquatic species could suppress the growth of invasive aquatic species with similar traits

Multiple invaders usually co-occur in an ecosystem and threaten the ecological safety of ecosystems. Invasive species from the same origin could facilitate each other’s establishment, while some

Highly competitive native aquatic species could suppress the growth of invasive aquatic species with similar traits

It is shown that highly competitive native species could reduce the growth and the invasive success of less competitive invasive species with similar traits in communities.

Opposing mechanisms of competition determine species invasions and functional diversity

It is found that trait differences between invasive and resident species were not only associated with niche differences which promoted the coexistence of dissimilar species, but also competitive ability differences which acted in the opposite fashion.

Biotic resistance or invasional meltdown? Diversity reduces invasibility but not exotic dominance in southern California epibenthic communities

High community diversity may either prevent or promote the establishment of exotic species. The biotic resistance hypothesis holds that species-rich communities are more resistant to invasion than

Serial invasions can disrupt the time course of ecosystem recovery

Many-decade time-series across ecosystems are synthesized to resolve shared changes in seven key features following invasion by quagga and zebra mussels, two widespread congeners that re-engineer and increasingly co-invade freshwaters.



Mammal invaders on islands: impact, control and control impact

It is difficult to predict the outcome of the removal of key species, such as a top predator, given the numerous and complex population interactions among island species, and justifies careful pre‐control study and preparation prior to initiating the eradication of an alien species, in order to avoid an ecological catastrophe.

Competitive interactions between co-occurring invaders: identifying asymmetries between two invasive crayfish species

The ability of P. leniusculus to withstand competition pressure from another successful invasive species underscores its potential to establish dominant populations and highlights the importance of understanding interspecies competition in prioritizing potential management activities or control efforts in contact zones.

Biotic indirect effects: a neglected concept in invasion biology

The evidence for the occurrence of four of the most commonly documented indirect effects (apparent competition, indirect mutualism/commensalism, exploitative competition, and trophic cascades) in the invasion process is examined.

Restoring Balance: Using Exotic Species to Control Invasive Exotic Species

Extension of biological control to new targets of conservation importance, such as invasive aquatic invertebrates and pestiferous vertebrates, is warranted.

Recent biological invasion may hasten invasional meltdown by accelerating historical introductions.

  • E. Grosholz
  • Environmental Science
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  • 2005
It is demonstrated that a recently introduced crab has resulted in the rapid spread and increase of an introduced bivalve that had been rare in the system for nearly 50 yr through the positive indirect effects of predation by the introduced crab on native bivalves.

Positive Interactions of Nonindigenous Species: Invasional Meltdown?

There is little evidence that interference among introduced species at levels currently observed significantly impedes further invasions, and synergistic interactions among invaders may well lead to accelerated impacts on native ecosystems – an invasional ‘meltdown’ process.

Characterizing ecosystem‐level consequences of biological invasions: the role of ecosystem engineers

Recognition of engineering as a major means by which invasive species affect ecosystems provides a unifying theme for invasion biology and offers a chance to consider more fully the general role of species in ecosystems.

Invasional interference due to similar inter- and intraspecific competition between invaders may affect management.

  • E. RauschertK. Shea
  • Environmental Science
    Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America
  • 2012
It is predicted that invasions of either species singly, or both species together, would have similar impacts, and when prioritizing which areas to target to prevent the spread of one of the species, it is better to focus on areas as yet unaffected by its congener.

An experimental study of competition between fire ants and Argentine ants in their native range.

Results indicate that neither S. invicta nor L. humile achieves the same degree of behavioral or ecological dominance where they co-occur in native populations as they do in areas where either is common in their introduced range, and strongly suggest that interspecific competition is an important limiting factor for both S. Invicta and L. Humile in South America.