• DOI:10.1093/JAAREL/XLVIII.2.207
• Corpus ID: 170516831

Outside the Mainstream: Women's Religion and Women Religious Leaders in Nineteenth-Century America

@article{Bednarowski1980OutsideTM,
  title={Outside the Mainstream: Women's Religion and Women Religious Leaders in Nineteenth-Century America},
  author={Mary Farrell Bednarowski},
  journal={Journal of the American Academy of Religion},
  year={1980},
  pages={207-232}
}

• M. F. Bednarowski
• Published 1 June 1980
• History
• Journal of the American Academy of Religion

In order to understand fully the status of women in a particular religious tradition, it is helpful to consider the views held within that tradition on four topics: the character of the divine, human nature, the function of the clergy, and the nature of marriage. While the assumptions which have been held by mainstream religious groups on these topics appear to be linked to the absence of female leadership, certain marginal religious movements have taken positions which seem to have a positive relation to leadership roles for women. These marginal groups are characterized by (1) a perception of the divine that deemphasizes the masculine, (2) a tempering or denial of the doctrine of the Fall, (3) a denial of the need for a traditional ordained clergy, and (4) a view of marriage which does not hold that marriage and motherhood are the only acceptable roles for women. In this analysis of Shakerism, Spiritualism, Christian Science, and Theosophy, the author examines the particular manner in which each manifested these doctrinal positions and explores the roles which women occupied within the four groups. The article concludes with some observations on the causal relationship between doctrine and leadership roles for women and on how the concerns expressed in the four movements discussed parallel those of contemporary feminist theology. Mary Farrell Bednarowski (Ph.D., Minnesota) is Assistant Professor of Religious Studies and Director of the Master of Arts in Religious Studies Program at United Theological Seminary of the Twin Cities. She is the author of "Nineteenth-Century Spiritualism in Wisconsin" (The Wisconsin Magazine of History). This content downloaded from 157.55.39.163 on Fri, 18 Nov 2016 04:17:34 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 208 Mary Farrell Bednarowski t is nearly impossible to summon the names of individual women who have achieved fame within the context of American religious history. The experiences and contributions of women have gone largely unrecorded in the standard American religious histories. Cotton Mather spoke of women as the "hidden ones" as far as religion was concerned, and contemporary scholars note that the situation remains much the same in the twentieth century as it did in the seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth centuries; the women go to church and the men exercise the authority as members of the clergy and as professional theologians./ 1/ There is growing agreement among scholars that certain aspects of institutionalized religion, especially Christianity, have been responsible for excluding women from positions of leadership in American religion. These are the pervasive use of masculine language for the divine, which has tended to link the male with the numinous and exclude the female; the belief that the Fall resulted in human depravity and serves to prove the moral weakness of women, particularly; the insistence that the divine "plan" for women was revealed in St. Paul's admonition that women keep silent in church; and the assumption that woman's subordination to man was divinely ordained and revealed in Scripture and that this subordination has implications for marriage and for woman's place./2/ There are numerous examples of women's exclusion from acknowledged positions of religious authority from the seventeenth century to the present. In 1636 Ann Hutchinson was accused not only of teaching heresy, but of stepping beyond her place: she was told, "You have rather bine a Husband than a Wife and a Preacher than a Hearer; and a Magistrate than a Subject" (Hall: 382-83). Little had changed for women by the early nineteenth century. R. Pierce Beaver gives numerous examples of the controversy over whether Protestant women even had the right to gather to pray for the missions, much less form their own missionary societies. The struggles of mid-nineteenthcentury women like Congregationalist Antoinette Brown (Solomon) and Methodist Anna Howard Shaw (Flexner) illustrate the firmly rooted assumption that women were by nature unsuited to be members of the clergy. Our own time is witness to a profusion of activity regarding the ordination of women in many denominations. The expressed need of these denominations to demonstrate Scriptural approval-or at least lack of disapproval-of women's ordination; the theological controversies over the ordination question; and the subsequent difficulties of placing women who have been ordained in some of the denominations all give evidence that the aforementioned assumptions about the rightful place of women in organized religion are still in operation. In the so-called marginal or nonmainstream religions, however, it has often been a different story in regard to female leadership./3/ Individual women who have achieved prominence in American religious history have usually been those associated with marginal religious movements whose sources of doctrine and inspiration have been outside the Bible or in addition to it: Ann Lee, founder of the Shakers; the Fox sisters, who are closely associated with Spiritualism; Ellen G. White of the Adventist movement; This content downloaded from 157.55.39.163 on Fri, 18 Nov 2016 04:17:34 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Outside the Mainstream 209 Mary Baker Eddy, founder of Christian Science; and Helena P. Blavatsky of the Theosophical movement. Why is it that women were able to achieve positions of leadership in some religious movements, contrary both to established tradition and to cultural assumptions about the proper role of women as well? It is my contention that women achieved leadership positions and equal status with men in religious movements which embodied assumptions about the divine, about human nature, about the function of the clergy, and about marriage which ran counter to those in the mainstream traditions: 1. a perception of the divine that deemphasized the masculine either by means of a bisexual divinity or an impersonal, nonanthropomorphic divine principle; 2. a tempering or denial of the doctrine of the Fall; 3. a denial of the need for a traditional ordained clergy; 4. a view of marriage that did not stress the married state and motherhood as the proper sphere for woman and her only means of fulfillment. My isolating of these characteristics grew out of an attempt, first, to identify American women religious leaders and, second, upon finding most of them in the marginal movements, to understand what these movements might have in common that made them sympathetic to female leadership. As a result of my survey of religious movements in which women were prominent, I chose to analyze four in detail-the Shakers, the Spiritualists, the Christian Scientists, and the Theosophists-because they were founded by women (that statement must be qualified in regard to Spiritualism); because of the high degree to which women participated in them; because of their insistence that woman's spiritual equality must be embodied in practice; and because they exhibit in various ways the four characteristics described above. I had originally intended to include the Oneida Perfectionists in my analysis, but discovered that in spite of such characteristics as group marriage, the practice of birth control, and an understanding of the divine as bisexual, founder John Humphrey Noyes was highly patriarchal in his expressed understanding of woman's nature (Thomas:119-28). The four nineteenth-century American religious movements mentioned above produced a number of women leaders whose concern with the spiritual and social status of women has not been so strongly articulated again until the present feminist movement. The movements address in somewhat less cohesive form the very same concerns that feminists are voicing today in their critique of organized religion: the detrimental effect on women of the pervasiveness of the masculine in God language; the stereotype of women as morally weak as a result of the doctrine of the Fall; the virtual exclusion of women from the ordained clergy on the basis of essential unsuitability; and the narrow circumscribing of woman's proper sphere within marriage and motherhood. By contrast, in spite of sometimes bitter rivalries among them as well as different sources of doctrine, Shakerism, Spiritualism, Christian Science, and This content downloaded from 157.55.39.163 on Fri, 18 Nov 2016 04:17:34 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 210 Mary Farrell Bednarowski Theosophy all put forth doctrines about the divine, the human, the clergy, and marriage which provided a situation conducive to female leadership.