Outpatient management of patients with low-risk upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage: multicentre validation and prospective evaluation

  title={Outpatient management of patients with low-risk upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage: multicentre validation and prospective evaluation},
  author={A J Stanley and Dawn Ashley and H R Dalton and Craig Mowat and Daniel R Gaya and E Thompson and U Warshow and Max Groome and A Cahill and George Benson and Oliver Blatchford and William R. Murray},
  journal={The Lancet},

Figures and Tables from this paper

Analysis of risk scoring for the outpatient management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding
The GBS but not the pre-endoscopy Rockall score identifies patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding who may be suitable for outpatient management, therefore potentially allowing for more efficient use of hospital resources.
The management of low-risk primary upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in the community: a 5-year observational study
Patients presenting with a primary upper upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage aged below 70 years with a Glasgow Blatchford Score of 2 or less are at a low risk, and can be safely managed in the community.
Outpatient management of low-risk patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: can we safely extend the Glasgow Blatchford Score in clinical practice?
Outpatient management of patients with UGIB is suggested and Glasgow Blatchford Score⩽1 has a high NPV for adverse outcomes within 30 days, suggesting that GBS⦽1 is safe in this population.
Update on risk scoring systems for patients with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.
  • A. Stanley
  • Medicine
    World journal of gastroenterology
  • 2012
The existing pre- and post-endoscopy risk scores for UGIH are described and the published data comparing them in the prediction of outcome are assessed.
Performance of new thresholds of the Glasgow Blatchford score in managing patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
  • S. Laursen, H. Dalton, A. Stanley
  • Medicine
    Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association
  • 2015
Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study
The Glasgow Blatchford score has high accuracy at predicting need for hospital based intervention or death and scores of ≤1 appear the optimum threshold for directing patients to outpatient management.
Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
It is suggested that the GBS has superior sensitivity relative to the AIMS65 in identifying patients who were not likely to require interventions, including emergency endoscopy, as well as providing guidance to clinicians.
Risk assessment scores for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and their use in clinical practice
There is no evidence that risk scores can accurately identify patients with UGIB at high risk of adverse outcome, but studies have shown the latest risk assessment score, the AIMS65, looks promising in the prediction of mortality.
Use of glasgow-blatchford bleeding score reduces hospital stay duration and costs for patients with low-risk upper GI bleeding
Implementing the Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score as a tool for triage of hospital outpatients who present with UGI bleeding allowed us to identify those who could safely be discharged for ambulatory management and decreased management costs.
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk scores: Who, when and why?
The different risk scores used in the UGIB setting are described, the most important research is highlighted, why and when their use may be helpful, reflects on the problems that remain unresolved and guides future research with practical impact.


Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.
It was found that age, shock, comorbidity, diagnosis, major stigmata of recent haemorrhage, and rebleeding are all independent predictors of mortality when assessed using multiple logistic regression and a numerical score that closely follows the predictions generated by logistical regression equations was developed.
Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: guidelines
These guidelines represent what, in the view of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) endoscopy committee, defines best clinical practice and are of value in making the best use of resources by fast tracking low risk patients, thereby optimising duration of hospital stay.
Three-year prospective validation of a pre-endoscopic risk stratification in patients with acute upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage
Using this risk stratification to identify groups of patients at high and low risk of mortality, re-bleeding and need for urgent treatment intervention following acute upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage should allow targeting of more intensive treatment where it might be of most benefit.
Outpatient management for low-risk nonvariceal upper GI bleeding: a randomized controlled trial.
Outpatient care of patients at low risk for recurrent nonvariceal upper GI hemorrhage is safe and can lead to significant savings in hospital costs.
Predicting poor outcome from acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage.
Patients admitted with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding were unlikely to have a poor outcome if these risk factors were absent and these CPRs might make hospital management more efficient by identifying low-risk patients for whom early hospital discharge is possible.
Prospective evaluation of a clinical guideline recommending hospital length of stay in upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage.
Investigation of the clinical practice guideline safely reduced hospital LOS for selected low-risk patients with acute UGIH found it suitable for early discharge from the hospital, and further prospective validation in other settings is warranted.