Outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

@article{Montalti2015OutcomesOR,
  title={Outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.},
  author={Roberto Montalti and Giammauro Berardi and Alberto Patriti and Marco Vivarelli and R I Troisi},
  journal={World journal of gastroenterology},
  year={2015},
  volume={21 27},
  pages={
          8441-51
        }
}
AIM To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on robotic-assisted vs laparoscopic liver resections. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane Library Central. Participants of any age and sex, who underwent robotic or laparoscopic liver resection were considered following these criteria: (1) studies comparing robotic and laparoscopic liver resection; (2) studies reporting at least one perioperative outcome; and (3) if more than one study… CONTINUE READING
Tweets
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 4 times. VIEW TWEETS

Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 14 CITATIONS

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 76 REFERENCES

Outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic hepatectomy : A systematic review and meta - analysis

  • A Patriti, M Vivarelli, RI Troisi
  • World J Gastroenterol
  • 2015

Ten years of experience

  • CM Kang, DH Kim, WJ. Lee
  • Surg
  • 2014

versus open hepatectomy with or without synchronous colectomy for colorectal liver metastasis: a meta-analysis

  • Y Zhou, Y Xiao, L Wu, B Li, H. Li
  • PLoS One
  • 2014

59 a safe and efficacious alternative to open resection for colorectal liver metastasis: a meta-analysis

  • A Rao, G Rao, I. Ahmed
  • BMC Surg
  • 2013

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…