Outcomes associated with planned place of birth among women with low-risk pregnancies.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Previous studies have shown that planned home birth is associated with a decreased likelihood of intrapartum intervention with no difference in neonatal outcomes compared with planned hospital birth. The purpose of our study was to evaluate different birth settings by comparing neonatal mortality, morbidity and rates of birth interventions between planned home and planned hospital births in Ontario, Canada. METHODS We used a provincial database of all midwifery-booked pregnancies between 2006 and 2009 to compare women who planned home birth at the onset of labour to a matched cohort of women with low-risk pregnancies who had planned hospital births attended by midwives. We conducted subgroup analyses by parity. Our primary outcome was stillbirth, neonatal death (< 28 d) or serious morbidity (Apgar score < 4 at 5 min or resuscitation with positive pressure ventilation and cardiac compressions). RESULTS We compared 11 493 planned home births and 11 493 planned hospital births. The risk of our primary outcome did not differ significantly by planned place of birth (relative risk [RR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-1.55). These findings held true for both nulliparous (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.62-1.73) and multiparous women (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.49-2.05). All intrapartum interventions were lower among planned home births. INTERPRETATION Compared with planned hospital birth, planned home birth attended by midwives in a jurisdiction where home birth is well-integrated into the health care system was not associated with a difference in serious adverse neonatal outcomes but was associated with fewer intrapartum interventions.

DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.150564

6 Figures and Tables

05010020162017
Citations per Year

51 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 51 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Hutton2016OutcomesAW, title={Outcomes associated with planned place of birth among women with low-risk pregnancies.}, author={Eileen K. Hutton and Adriana Cappelletti and Angela H Reitsma and Julia C Simioni and Jordyn Horne and Caroline McGregor and Rashid J. Ahmed}, journal={CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne}, year={2016}, volume={188 5}, pages={E80-90} }