Osseous changes and condyle position in TMJ tomograms: impact of RDC/TMD clinical diagnoses on agreement between expected and actual findings.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of clinical TMJ diagnosis, gender, and age on the agreement between expected and actual radiographic findings. STUDY DESIGN A total of 204 patients with TMJ symptoms were examined using the Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC/TMD). Expected radiographic findings were recorded. TMJ tomograms in closed and open mouth position were assessed for osseous changes and condyle position. Expected and actual findings were compared. Logistic regression analyses were performed with agreement on radiographic findings as the dependent variable and with clinical RDC/TMD diagnoses, gender and age as the independent variables. RESULTS The number of radiographic findings was mostly underestimated. A clinical diagnosis of osteoarthritis and age increased the chance of overestimating osseous changes. Disc displacement and age decreased the chance of agreement on certain condyle positions. CONCLUSION Tomography often revealed unexpected findings. It was not possible to select particular patient groups who would benefit more or less from a radiographic examination.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.021
02040608020102011201220132014201520162017
Citations per Year

60 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 60 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Wiese2008OsseousCA, title={Osseous changes and condyle position in TMJ tomograms: impact of RDC/TMD clinical diagnoses on agreement between expected and actual findings.}, author={Mie Wiese and Ann Wenzel and Hanne Hintze and Arne Petersson and Kerstin Knutsson and Merete Bakke and Thomas List and Peter Svensson}, journal={Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics}, year={2008}, volume={106 2}, pages={e52-63} }