Orthopedic Treatment of Skeletal Class III Malocclusions With Maxillary Deficiency

@article{Bozkaya2015OrthopedicTO,
  title={Orthopedic Treatment of Skeletal Class III Malocclusions With Maxillary Deficiency},
  author={Erdal Bozkaya and Sema Y{\"u}ksel and Tuba Tortop and Neslihan {\"U}ç{\"u}nc{\"u} and Emine Kaygısız and Deniz Gencer},
  journal={Turkish Journal of Orthodontics},
  year={2015},
  volume={28},
  pages={19-25}
}
ABSTRACT Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment effects of a double-plate appliance (DPA) and a double-plate appliance and facemask combination (DPA-FM) in correcting Class III malocclusions. Materials and Methods: The material consisted of lateral cephalometric radiographs of 40 children with skeletal and dental Class III malocclusion. In the first treatment group, 13 patients (mean age: 10 years 3 months) were treated with DPA. In the second treatment group, 15… Expand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 34 REFERENCES
Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
  • T. Ucem, Neslihan Ucuncü, S. Yüksel
  • Mathematics, Medicine
  • American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics
  • 2004
TLDR
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of the double-plate appliance (DPA) and the facemask (FM) in treating skeletal Class III malocclusions and found significant differences compared with the control group. Expand
Cephalometric Changes in the Treatment of Class III Using the Fränkel Appliance*
TLDR
According to these study results, FR-3 treatment has an obvious effect on maxillary development, and affects the shape and, to a certain degree, the position of the mandible. Expand
Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
TLDR
A modified maxillary protractor treatment is effective for correcting skeletal Class III malocclusion and produced a significant positive improvement in maxillo-mandibular relations, according to the results. Expand
Modified tandem traction bow appliance compared with facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
TLDR
Both appliances were found to be effective in the treatment of Class III malocclusion and their skeletal and dental effects showed differences due to their design. Expand
A comparison of chincap and maxillary protraction appliances in the treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusions.
TLDR
In comparing the two groups, the maxilla was displaced more anteriorly and the molar relationship correction was greater in the maxillary protraction appliance group (P < 0.05). Expand
Comparison of double-plate appliance/facemask combination and facemask therapy in treating class III malocclusions.
TLDR
In the treatment of Class III malocclusion, both appliances were effective and the significant sagittal changes in the lower incisors and pogonion in the FM group compared with the nonsignificant changes inThe DPA-FM group might be due to the restriction effect of acrylic blocks in the DPA -FM group. Expand
Dentofacial effects of a modified tandem traction bow appliance.
TLDR
In both treatment groups, dental and skeletal correction of the Class III malocclusion was achieved and upper molar tipping and sagittal displacement of point A was found to be significantly greater in the late treatment group compared with the early treatment group (P < 0.05). Expand
Mandibular skeletal changes induced by early functional treatment of Class III malocclusion: a superimposition study.
  • I. Tollaro, T. Baccetti, L. Franchi
  • Medicine
  • American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics
  • 1995
TLDR
This therapeutically induced change in growth direction of theMandibular condyle was considered a skeletal sign of anterior morphogenetic rotation of the mandible, i.e., a mechanism compensating for excessive mandibular growth. Expand
Changes following the use of protraction headgear for early correction of Class III malocclusion.
TLDR
Despite some relapse, the patients demonstrated a net improvement in maxillomandibular relationship and overjet at the end of follow-up relative to the controls, suggesting overcorrection of the overjet during treatment may be important for maintaining a successful correction. Expand
A comparison of two different techniques for early correction of Class III malocclusion.
TLDR
Significantly greater skeletal changes arose with PFM therapy than with RTB therapy or in the control group (SNA, SNB, and ANB; P < .001), and the dentoalveolar effects of RTB treatment exceeded those of PFM treatment. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
...