Origins of Homophily in an Evolving Social Network1

  title={Origins of Homophily in an Evolving Social Network1},
  author={Gueorgi Kossinets and Duncan J. Watts},
  journal={American Journal of Sociology},
  pages={405 - 450}
The authors investigate the origins of homophily in a large university community, using network data in which interactions, attributes, and affiliations are all recorded over time. The analysis indicates that highly similar pairs do show greater than average propensity to form new ties; however, it also finds that tie formation is heavily biased by triadic closure and focal closure, which effectively constrain the opportunities among which individuals may select. In the case of triadic closure… 
Homophily and Influence: The Weakness of Weak Ties
It is shown that a certain form of link support (reminiscent of, but quite different from, clustering) provides a key basis to understand the strength of different links, and provides an interesting twist to Granovetter's (1973) celebrated claim that strong links tend to be redundant and hence informationally weak.
Homophily and Segregation in Cooperative Networks1
Social networks affect individuals’ ability to solve conflicts between individual and collective interests. Indeed, the ability to seek out cooperative others is a key explanation for the high levels
Understanding spatial homophily: the case of peer influence and social selection
A microscopic study of the peer influence and social selection mechanisms in LBSNs, which indicates that while the similarity of friends' spatial trails at a geographically global scale cannot be attributed to peer influence, the latter can explain up to 40% of the geographically localized similarity between friends.
Cumulative effects of triadic closure and homophily in social networks
The model shows that even small individual bias may prompt network-level changes such as segregation or core group dominance, and highlights that individual-level mechanisms should not be analyzed separately without considering the dynamics of society as a whole.
Structural transition in social networks: The role of homophily
We introduce a model for the formation of social networks, which takes into account the homophily or the tendency of individuals to associate and bond with similar others, and the mechanisms of
Monophily in social networks introduces similarity among friends-of-friends
Altenburger and Ugander identify ‘monophily’ or the overdispersion of attribute preferences in a social network and show that it can be used to predict otherwise hidden attribute information about an individual.
A Markov chain analysis of the dynamics of homophily
A model is introduced that explains the emergence of homophily as an aggregate group and network level outcome and is used to design a non-homophilic node detection algorithm for identifying nodes that establish connections without a particular preference for either node type.
Homophily as a process generating social networks: insights from Social Distance Attachment model
It is found that homophily, especially when combined with a random edge rewiring, is sufficient to reproduce many of the characteristic features of social networks, and it is demonstrated that degree assortativity can be highly dependent on the particular kind of enforced degree sequence.
The paradox of second-order homophily in networks
A local view of homophily is taken, defining notions of first-order homophilous of a node (its individual tendency to link to similar others) and second-orderhomophily of a nodes (the aggregate first-orders of its neighbors); through this view, a surprising result is found that applies with only minimal assumptions on the graph topology.
Homophily and Influence Arnold Polanski University of East Anglia
We study how learning and influence co-evolve in a social network, eventually determining both the pattern of social influence across individuals and the distribution of their opinions or beliefs.


Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks
Similarity breeds connection. This principle—the homophily principle—structures network ties of every type, including marriage, friendship, work, advice, support, information transfer, exchange,
behavioral, and intrapersonal characteristics. Homophily limits people's social worlds in a way that has powerful implications for the infor- mation they receive, the attitudes they form, and the
Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups.
Recent work on the organized sources of network ties and on the social structural determinants of association are synthesized to produce several hypotheses about homophily. These hypotheses are
Empirical Analysis of an Evolving Social Network
This work analyzed a dynamic social network comprising 43,553 students, faculty, and staff at a large university, in which interactions between individuals are inferred from time-stamped e-mail headers recorded over one academic year and are matched with affiliations and attributes.
Quantifying social group evolution
The focus is on networks capturing the collaboration between scientists and the calls between mobile phone users, and it is found that large groups persist for longer if they are capable of dynamically altering their membership, suggesting that an ability to change the group composition results in better adaptability.
Racial Homophily and Its Persistence in Newcomers' Social Networks
Over the time period studied there was no significant change in homophily among the racial groups' networks, despite the explicit promotion of diversity in recruitment of students, formation of heterogeneous classes and teams, and active support by the MBA program administrators.
Geographic routing in social networks
A richer model relating geography and social-network friendship is introduced, in which the probability of befriending a particular person is inversely proportional to the number of closer people.
The Structure of Adult Friendship Choices
This paper examines bias toward status-similarity in adult friendships in Detroit and a West German city. Principles of meeting and "mating," by which strangers are converted to acquaintances and
The Strength of Weak Ties
Analysis of social networks is suggested as a tool for linking micro and macro levels of sociological theory. The procedure is illustrated by elaboration of the macro implications of one aspect of