Optimal decisions for contrast discrimination.

@article{Sanborn2011OptimalDF,
  title={Optimal decisions for contrast discrimination.},
  author={Adam Sanborn and Peter Dayan},
  journal={Journal of vision},
  year={2011},
  volume={11 14}
}
Contrast discrimination functions for simple gratings famously look like a dipper. Discrimination thresholds are lower than detection thresholds for moderate pedestal contrasts, and the rate of growth of thresholds as the pedestal contrast gets larger typically lies between the values implied by two popular treatments of noise. Here, we suggest a new normative treatment of the dipper, showing how it emerges from Bayesian inference based on the responses of a population of orientation-tuned… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 65 references

Revisiting spatial vision: toward a unifying model.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision • 2000
View 10 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

A power law for contrast discrimination.

Vision research • 1981
View 5 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Contrast masking in human vision.

Journal of the Optical Society of America • 1980
View 6 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Orientational selectivity of the human visual system.

The Journal of physiology • 1966
View 4 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Increment thresholds at low intensities considered as signal/noise discriminations.

The Journal of physiology • 1957
View 4 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

The history of dipper functions

J. A. Solomon
Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, • 2009
View 3 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Sensory analysis. London/San Diego

D. Laming
1986
View 5 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…