Opposite Ends of the Same Stick? Multi-Method Test of the Dimensionality of Individualism and Collectivism

@article{Taras2014OppositeEO,
  title={Opposite Ends of the Same Stick? Multi-Method Test of the Dimensionality of Individualism and Collectivism},
  author={Vas Taras and Riikka M. Sarala and Paul M. Muchinsky and Markus Kemmelmeier and Theodore M. Singelis and Andreja Avsec and Heather M. Coon and Dale L. Dinnel and Wendi L. Gardner and Sherry L. Grace and Erin E. Hardin and Sandy Hsu and Joel T. Johnson and Zahide Karakitapoğlu Ayg{\"u}n and Emiko S. Kashima and Arnulf Kolstad and Taciano L. Milfont and John G. Oetzel and Sumie Okazaki and Tahira M Probst and Toru Sato and Maggie Shafiro and Seth J. Schwartz and H. Colleen Sinclair},
  journal={Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology},
  year={2014},
  volume={45},
  pages={213 - 245}
}
The construct of individualism–collectivism (IND-COL) has become the definitive standard in cross-cultural psychology, management, and related fields. It is also among the most controversial, in particular, with regard to the ambiguity of its dimensionality: Some view IND and COL as the opposites of a single continuum, whereas others argue that the two are independent constructs. We explored the issue through seven different tests using original individual-level data from 50 studies and meta… Expand
The expanded view of individualism and collectivism: One, two, or four dimensions?
Recent research to analyze and discuss cultural differences has employed a combination of five major dimensions of individualism–collectivism, power distance, uncertainty avoidance,Expand
Greater Than the Sum of Its Parts: Development of a Measure of Collectivism Among Asians
TLDR
The Brief Collectivism Questionnaire appears to be a multidimensional, psychometrically sound measure that assesses broadband and narrowband contents of collectivism among Asians and clarifies how this construct is related to adjustment outcomes. Expand
The five-factor model and individualism and collectivism in South Africa: Implications for personality assessment
The five-factor model (FFM) of personality is one of the prominent models in contemporary psychology and defines personality in terms of five broad factors, namely Neuroticism, Extraversion, OpennessExpand
Theoretical and methodological challenges in cross-cultural social psychology research
Social psychology depends on assumptions about the cultural context in which an experiment takes place. Cross-cultural psychology identifies and explains differences not accounted for in theseExpand
Beyond the 'east-west' dichotomy: Global variation in cultural models of selfhood.
TLDR
A new 7-dimensional model of self-reported ways of being independent or interdependent is developed and validated across cultures and will allow future researchers to test more accurately the implications of cultural models of selfhood for psychological processes in diverse ecocultural contexts. Expand
Variations in horizontal and vertical individualism-collectivism in four regions of Mexico / Variaciones en el individualismo-colectivismo horizontal y vertical en cuatro regiones de México
Abstract Cultures can be analysed through cultural syndromes (shared patterns of beliefs, attitudes, norms, roles and values organized around a theme). One of these syndromes,Expand
Culture Three Ways: Culture and Subcultures Within Countries
  • D. Oyserman
  • Sociology, Medicine
  • Annual review of psychology
  • 2017
TLDR
These methods highlight three ways that culture organizes experience: (a) It shields reflexive processing by making everyday life feel predictable, (b) it scaffolds which cognitive procedure will be the default in ambiguous situations, and (c) it facilitates situation‐specific accessibility of alternate cognitive procedures. Expand
Individualist–Collectivist Culture and Trust Radius A Multilevel Approach
We apply a multilevel approach to examine empirically the nexus between individualist and collectivist culture on the one hand and people’s radius of trust on the other. People’s trust level (i.e.,Expand
Core self‐evaluations, perceptions of group potency, and job performance: The moderating role of individualism and collectivism cultural profiles
The current study examines the contingency role of individualism-collectivism profiles on relationships involving core self-evaluations (CSE), perceptions of group potency (PGP), and job performance.Expand
Societal Culture in Iceland and Lithuania: Managerial Implications
This article contributes to cross-cultural management literature, by providing empirical data from two underresearched countries, to serve in the future as benchmark cultural shift research.Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 91 REFERENCES
The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals
Following concepts introduced by Markus and Kitayama, this study describes the theoretical and empirical development of a scale to measure the strength of an individual's interdependent andExpand
Measurement of individualism-collectivism
Abstract Collectivism was defined as a set of feelings, beliefs, behavioral intentions, and behaviors related to solidarity and concern for others. A paper-and-pencil instrument was developed toExpand
Horizontal and Vertical Dimensions of Individualism and Collectivism: A Theoretical and Measurement Refinement
In developing a new scale, this article makes theoretical and measurement distinctions between vertical and horizontal individualism and collectivism. Vertical collectivism includes perceiving theExpand
A Multimethod Multitrait Validity Assessment of Self‐Construal in Japan, Korea, and the United States
A large number of previous studies have used self-construal to predict communication outcomes. Recent evidence, however, suggests that validity problems may exist in self-construal measurement. TheExpand
Variations in Collectivism and Individualism by Ingroup and Culture: Confirmatory Factor Analyses
Five models of collectivism and individualism, which varied by ingroup and measurement specification, were tested with confirmatory factor analyses. The sample consisted of 493 college students fromExpand
Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism.
TLDR
It is argued that there is a conceptual confusion about the meaning of ingroups that constitute the target of collectivism, and a theoretical framework is proposed that draws on M. B. Brewer and G. Gardner's conceptualization of individual, relational, and collective selves and their manifestation in self-representations, beliefs, and values. Expand
Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism
The constructs of horizontal (H) and vertical (V) individualism (I) and collectivism (C) were theoretically defined and empirically supported. Study 1 confirmed, via factor analysis, that the 4Expand
Structural Equivalence of the Values Domain Across Cultures
The authors examine the cross-cultural equivalence of the internal structure of the values domain, as measured by the Schwartz Value Survey. Data come from 38 countries, each represented by a studentExpand
Self‐Construal Scales Lack Validity
Self-construal is thought to mediate and explain the effects of culture on a wide variety of outcome variables. A meta-analysis of published cross-cultural self-construal research is reported in thisExpand
Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.
TLDR
European Americans were found to be both more individualistic-valuing personal independence more-and less collectivistic-feeling duty to in-groups less-than others, and among Asians, only Chinese showed large effects, being both less individualistic and more collectivist. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...