Opening the Publication Process with Executable Research Compendia
@article{Nst2017OpeningTP, title={Opening the Publication Process with Executable Research Compendia}, author={Daniel N{\"u}st and M. Konkol and E. Pebesma and C. Kray and Marc Schutzeichel and H. Przibytzin and J. Lorenz}, journal={D Lib Mag.}, year={2017}, volume={23} }
A strong movement towards openness has seized science. Open data and methods, open source software, Open Access, open reviews, and open research platforms provide the legal and technical solutions to new forms of research and publishing. However, publishing reproducible research is still not common practice. Reasons include a lack of incentives and a missing standardized infrastructure for providing research material such as data sets and source code together with a scientific paper. Therefore… CONTINUE READING
Topics from this paper
Paper Mentions
30 Citations
Publishing computational research - a review of infrastructures for reproducible and transparent scholarly communication
- Computer Science, Medicine
- Research integrity and peer review
- 2020
- 1
- PDF
Publishing computational research - A review of infrastructures for reproducible and transparent scholarly communication
- Computer Science, Engineering
- ArXiv
- 2020
- 4
APRICOT: Advanced Platform for Reproducible Infrastructures in the Cloud via Open Tools
- Computer Science, Medicine
- Methods of information in medicine
- 2020
- PDF
Creating Interactive Scientific Publications using Bindings
- Computer Science
- Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact.
- 2019
- 5
Leveraging Container Technologies in a GIScience Project: A Perspective from Open Reproducible Research
- Computer Science
- ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf.
- 2020
- 1
Interactive Tools for Reproducible Science - Understanding, Supporting, and Motivating Reproducible Science Practices
- Computer Science
- ArXiv
- 2020
- PDF
Ten simple rules for writing Dockerfiles for reproducible data science
- Computer Science, Medicine
- PLoS computational biology
- 2020
- PDF
Reproducible research and GIScience: an evaluation using AGILE conference papers
- Computer Science, Medicine
- PeerJ
- 2018
- 35
- PDF