Ontologies: principles, methods and applications

@article{Uschold1996OntologiesPM,
  title={Ontologies: principles, methods and applications},
  author={M. Uschold and M. Gr{\"u}ninger},
  journal={Knowl. Eng. Rev.},
  year={1996},
  volume={11},
  pages={93-136}
}
This paper is intended to serve as a comprehensive introduction to the emerging field concerned with the design and use of ontologies. We observe that disparate backgrounds, languages, tools and techniques are a major barrier to effective communication among people, organisations and/or software understanding (i.e. an “ontology”) in a given subject area, can improve such communication, which in turn, can give rise to greater reuse and sharing, inter-operability, and more reliable software… Expand
Reusing Certain Database Design Principles, Methods and Techniques for Ontology Theory, Construction and Methodology
TLDR
This paper identifies and discusses a number of the critical success factors for the “ontologization” of IT, namely large standardized ontological resources (ontobases), the so-called Semantic Web, and methodological, teachable approaches, and indicates how such methods may or must be adapted to be usable in the context of ontologies. Expand
Building Ontologies: Towards a Unified Methodology
TLDR
This paper identifies dimensions for characterising ontologies, and examines two such methods and gives a framework for comparing and unifying them, emphasising that di erent approaches are required forrence circumstances, and gives some guidelines for when to use which techniques. Expand
A Framework for Understanding and Classifying Ontology Applications
TLDR
A framework for understanding and classifying ontology applications is presented, using a relatively broad definition of ‘ontology’ to show that much of the work being done by software developers and standards organizations may be viewed as practical applications of ontologies. Expand
An Architecture and Toolset For Practical Ontology Engineering and Deployment :The DOGMA Approach
TLDR
This paper presents a specifically database-inspired approach (called DOGMA) for engineering formal ontologies, implemented as shared resources used to express agreed formal semantics for a real world domain, and claims it leads to methodological approaches that naturally extend database modeling theory and practice, and so may in turn lead to scalable solutions for ontology-based systems. Expand
A Framework for Understanding and Classifying Ontology Applications
TLDR
This paper identifies three main categories of ontology applications: 1) neutral authoring, 2) common access to information, and 3) indexing for search and identifies specific ontology application scenarios. Expand
Investigating ontology development for engineering design support
TLDR
This paper takes a practical approach to clarifying what ontologies are and how they might be useful in an important and representative phase of the engineering design process, that of design requirement development and capture. Expand
Grounding Ontologies with Social Processes and Natural Language
TLDR
This article extends a fact-oriented formalism for the construction of so-called hybrid ontologies and presents GOSPL, a collaborative ontology engineering method on top of this extension and describes how agreements on formal and informal descriptions are complementary and interplay. Expand
Overview and analysis of methodologies for building ontologies
TLDR
A conclusion to this study is that there is no completely mature methodological proposal for building ontologies, since there are some important activities and techniques that are missing in all these methodologies. Expand
State of the Art Survey Deliverable D 01
Ontologies are formalism whose purpose is to support humans or machines to share some common knowledge in a structured way. They allow the concepts and terms relevant to a given domain to beExpand
Building Conceptual Schemas by Refining General Ontologies
TLDR
This paper identifies and characterize the three activities required to develop a conceptual schema from a general ontology, that are refinement, pruning and refactoring, and highlights the differences of the new approach with respect to the traditional one. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 62 REFERENCES
Some ideas and examples to evaluate ontologies
  • A. Gómez-Pérez
  • Computer Science
  • Proceedings the 11th Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications
  • 1995
TLDR
A set of emerging ideas in evaluation of ontologies useful for ontology developers in the lab, as a foundation from which to perform technical evaluations; end users of ontology in companies; and future research are presented as a basis upon which to performs progressive and disciplined investigations in this area. Expand
Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Ontologies
TLDR
The goal of the TOVE (TOronto Virtual Enterprise) Enterprise Modelling project is to create the next generation Enterprise Model, a Common Sense Enterprise Model that has the ability to deduce answers to queries that require relatively shallow knowledge of the domain. Expand
A translation approach to portable ontology specifications
TLDR
This paper describes a mechanism for defining ontologies that are portable over representation systems, basing Ontolingua itself on an ontology of domain-independent, representational idioms. Expand
Towards a Methodology for Building Ontologies
TLDR
Some requirements for a comprehensive methodology for building on tologies are outlined and some important work that has been done in the area which could contribute to this goal are reviewed. Expand
Ontologies and Knowledge Bases. Towards a Terminological Clarification
TLDR
It is argued for the need of clear terminological choices regarding the technical use of terms like "ontology", "conceptualization" and "ontological commitment" in the current debate in AI, and the possible confusion between an ontology intended as a particular conceptual framework at the knowledge level and a concrete artifact at the symbol level. Expand
The Process Interchange Format and Framework
TLDR
This document provides the specification of the Process Interchange Format (PIF) version 1.2, which was developed by a working group including representatives from several universities and companies and has been used for experimental automatic translations among systems developed independently at three of these sites. Expand
The PIF Process Interchange Format and Framework PIF Working Group
TLDR
This document describes the first version of the Process Interchange Format (PIF, version 1.0), a format to help automatically exchange process descriptions among a wide variety of business process modeling and support systems such as: workflow software, flow charting tools, process simulation systems, and process repositories. Expand
An Ontology of Meta-Level Categories
TLDR
This work focuses on some meta-level ontological distinctions among unary predicates, like those between concepts and assertional properties, based on a revisitation of philosophical (and linguistic) literature in the perspective of knowledge representation. Expand
Tools for inventing organizations: toward a handbook of organizational processes
TLDR
A key element of the work is a novel approach to representing processes at various levels of abstraction which allows users to explicity represent the similarities (and differences) among related processes and to easily find or generate sensible alternatives for how a given process could be performed. Expand
Partially shared views: a scheme for communicating among groups that use different type hierarchies
TLDR
The space of general solutions to this translation problem and a scheme that synthesizes these solutions is explored and a composite scheme, called Partially Shared Views, is proposed that combines many of the best features of the other schemes. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...