• Corpus ID: 10648756

Online Political Discourse in the Trump Era

@article{Nithyanand2017OnlinePD,
  title={Online Political Discourse in the Trump Era},
  author={Rishab Nithyanand and Brian F. Schaffner and Phillipa Gill},
  journal={ArXiv},
  year={2017},
  volume={abs/1711.05303}
}
We identify general trends in the (in)civility and complexity of political discussions occurring on Reddit between January 2007 and May 2017 -- a period spanning both terms of Barack Obama's presidency and the first 100 days of Donald Trump's presidency. We then investigate four factors that are frequently hypothesized as having contributed to the declining quality of American political discourse -- (1) the rising popularity of Donald Trump, (2) increasing polarization and negative partisanship… 

Figures from this paper

Capturing Political Polarization of Reddit Submissions in the Trump Era

TLDR
This work presents a model that attempts to measure the political polarization of Reddit submissions during the first half of Donald Trump’s presidency by quantifying those who align themselves with pro-Trump ideologies and vice versa.

Social Media, Political Polarization, and Political Disinformation: A Review of the Scientific Literature

The following report is intended to provide an overview of the current state of the literature on the relationship between social media; political polarization; and political “disinformation,” a term

The Language of Extremism on Social Media: An Examination of Posts, Comments, and Themes on Reddit

Digital media give the public a voice to discuss or share their thoughts about political and social events. However, these discussions can often include language that contributes to creating toxic or

Online polarization and cross-fertilization in multi-cleavage societies: the case of Spain

The impact of the social media (SM) has been seen on the one hand as the cause of large exacerbation of negative messages, responsible for massively harmful societal phenomenon against democracies.

Over-Time Trends in Incivility on Social Media: Evidence From Political, Non-Political, and Mixed Sub-Reddits Over Eleven Years

Incivility in social media has become a major concern of the public, who perceive uncivil online interactions to be both widespread and increasing. This study provides a descriptive account of

Measuring the prevalence of online hate speech , with an application to the 2016 U . S . election

TLDR
An application of a new framework for measuring the prevalence of online hate speech over time demonstrates that hate speech and white nationalist language did not systematically increase on Twitter over the course of the 2016 U.S. election campaign or following Trump’s election.

Deny or bolster? A comparative study of crisis communication strategies between Trump and Cuomo in COVID-19

No echo in the chambers of political interactions on Reddit

TLDR
It is observed that Trump vs Clinton supporters have a preference for cross-cutting political interactions between the two communities rather than within-group interactions, thus contradicting the echo chamber narrative.

Roots of Trumpism: Homophily and Social Feedbackin Donald Trump Support on Reddit

TLDR
Evidence is found that the most prominent traits of a typical supporter of Donald Trump on Reddit include a predominance of masculine interests, a conservative and libertarian political leaning, and links with politically incorrect and conspiratorial content.

Group Salience, Inflammatory Rhetoric, and the Persistence of Hate Against Religious Minorities

Hate crimes surged at several points during and after the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Observers argued that hate crimes, especially against Muslims, increased due to inflammatory rhetoric. Did

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 29 REFERENCES

Understanding White Polarization in the 2016 Vote for President: The Sobering Role of Racism and Sexism

THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN FEATURED major-party candidateswho both explicitly put issues of race and gender at the forefront of the discourse. Notably, 2016 also witnessed the largest gap between

Measuring Offensive Speech in Online Political Discourse

TLDR
Preliminary results from a large-scale temporal measurement aimed at quantifying offensiveness in online political discussions are presented, using a database of over 168M Reddit comments made by over 7M pseudonyms between January 2015 and January 2017.

Affect, Not Ideology A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization

The current debate over the extent of polarization in the American mass public focuses on the extent to which partisans’ policy preferences have moved. Whereas "maximalists" claim that partisans’

Negative partisanship is real, measurable, and affects political behaviour

Many people explain their political involvement with reference to the kinds of outcomes they’d like to avoid, with Republicans and Democrats alike often framing their campaigns around ‘keeping out’

Is Polarization a Myth?

This article uses data from the American National Election Studies and national exit polls to test Fiorina's assertion that ideological polarization in the American public is a myth. Fiorina argues

Following the News? Reception of Uncivil Partisan Media and the Use of Incivility in Political Expression

Partisan, pundit-based media gets blamed for making political discourse more uncivil, and studies on incivility in mediated discourse have found that uncivil political media can induce negative

What Makes Us Click? Demonstrating Incentives for Angry Discourse with Digital-Age Field Experiments

Recent work on emotions in politics has the potential to help us understand what the explosion of new media sources means for the strategies politicians use and the information citizens receive. Past

Election Night’s Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation

A large literature has established a persistent association between the skills and resources citizens possess and their likelihood of participating in politics. However, the short-term motivational

Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity

Party identification is central to the study of American political behavior, yet there remains disagreement over whether it is largely instrumental or expressive in nature. We draw on social identity

Emotions, Partisanship, and Misperceptions: How Anger and Anxiety Moderate the Effect of Partisan Bias on Susceptibility to Political Misinformation

Citizens are frequently misinformed about political issues and candidates but the circumstances under which inaccurate beliefs emerge are not fully understood. This experimental study demonstrates