Online Misinformation: Challenges and Future Directions

@article{Fernndez2018OnlineMC,
  title={Online Misinformation: Challenges and Future Directions},
  author={Miriam Fern{\'a}ndez and Harith Alani},
  journal={Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018},
  year={2018}
}
Misinformation has become a common part of our digital media environments and it is compromising the ability of our societies to form informed opinions. It generates misperceptions, which have affected the decision making processes in many domains, including economy, health, environment, and elections, among others. Misinformation and its generation, propagation, impact, and management is being studied through a variety of lenses (computer science, social science, journalism, psychology, etc… Expand
Other Human Aspects of Misinformation Online Conference or Workshop Item
As a wicked problem, limiting the harm caused by misinformation requires merging multiple perspectives to the design of digital interventions, including an understanding of human behaviour andExpand
Opinions, Intentions, Freedom of Expression, ... , and Other Human Aspects of Misinformation Online
TLDR
This hands-on workshop proposes to unpack the state-of-the-art on social, societal and political studies and socio-technical solutions to stop mis-information, challenging the participants to first critically reflect upon limitations of existing approaches, to then co-create a future with integrating perspectives focusing on ethical aspects and societal impact. Expand
Understanding the Role of Human Values in the Spread of Misinformation
TLDR
In this paper, it is argued that integrating a valuesoriented perspective into computational approaches for handling misinformation could encourage misinformation prevention, and assist in predicting and ranking misinformation. Expand
Challenging Misinformation: Exploring Limits and Approaches
TLDR
This workshop will challenge participants to critically reflect the limits of existing socio-technical approaches and co-create scenarios in which digital platforms support misinformation resilience, to unpack the challenge at hand. Expand
Online Misinformation Spread: A Systematic Literature Map
TLDR
A literature systematic mapping was performed to produce a comprehensive overview of this research area and indicated that most studies focus on providing solutions to detect misinformation spread on social media platforms. Expand
Agents for Fighting Misinformation Spread on Twitter: Design Challenges
TLDR
A multi-agent approach to bridge Twitter users with fact-checked information is introduced, with a social bot, which nudges users sharing verified misinformation, and a conversational agent that verifies if there is a reputable fact-check available and explains existing assessments in natural language. Expand
WhatsApp and false information: a value-oriented evaluation
TLDR
An evaluation on WhatsApp with a values-oriented approach revealed aspects of the technical infrastructure and user interface that influence the way different stakeholders can use the tool to promote false information. Expand
Online misinformation about climate change
Edited by Irene Lorenzoni, Domain Editor, and Mike Hulme, Editor-in-Chief Abstract Policymakers, scholars, and practitioners have all called attention to the issue of misinformation in the climateExpand
Analysing the Effect of Recommendation Algorithms on the Amplification of Misinformation
TLDR
An analysis of the effect of some of the most popular recommendation algorithms on the spread of misinformation in Twitter and a set of guidelines on how to adapt these algorithms is provided. Expand
Recommender Systems and Misinformation: The Problem or the Solution?
TLDR
Some of the key challenges behind assessing and measuring the effect of existing recommendation algorithms on the recommendation of misinforming articles and how such algorithms could be adapted, modified, and evaluated to counter this effect based on existing social science and psychology research are described. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 85 REFERENCES
'Misinformation? What of it?' Motivations and individual differences in misinformation sharing on social media
TLDR
It is beneficial to include affective and motivational factors in information behavior research, and information literacy training may also draw from the attitude change literature to deliver training that combines knowledge on information evaluation and sharing with affective messages that target individuals' motivations. Expand
Misinformation and Its Correction
TLDR
Recommendations may help practitioners—including journalists, health professionals, educators, and science communicators—design effective misinformation retractions, educational tools, and public-information campaigns. Expand
Viral Misinformation: The Role of Homophily and Polarization
TLDR
In an environment where misinformation is pervasive, users' aggregation around shared beliefs may make the usual exposure to conspiracy stories (polarization) a determinant for the virality of false information. Expand
Hoaxy: A Platform for Tracking Online Misinformation
TLDR
Haxy is introduced, a platform for the collection, detection, and analysis of online misinformation and its related fact-checking efforts, and a preliminary analysis of a sample of public tweets containing both fake news and fact checking is presented. Expand
Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society
In recent years, scholarship around media technologies has finally shed the assumption that these technologies are separate from and powerfully determining of social life, looking at them instead asExpand
Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change
TLDR
The current research bridges the divide by exploring how people evaluate and process consensus cues in a polarized information environment and evidence is provided that it is possible to pre‐emptively protect public attitudes about climate change against real‐world misinformation. Expand
The spreading of misinformation online
TLDR
A massive quantitative analysis of Facebook shows that information related to distinct narratives––conspiracy theories and scientific news––generates homogeneous and polarized communities having similar information consumption patterns, and derives a data-driven percolation model of rumor spreading that demonstrates that homogeneity and polarization are the main determinants for predicting cascades’ size. Expand
Undermining the Corrective Effects of Media‐Based Political Fact Checking? The Role of Contextual Cues and Naïve Theory
Media-based fact checking contributes to more accurate political knowledge, but its corrective effects are limited. We argue that biographical information included in a corrective message, which isExpand
In Related News, That Was Wrong: The Correction of Misinformation Through Related Stories Functionality in Social Media
Research on social media and research on correcting misinformation are both growing areas in communication, but for the most part they have not found common ground. This study seeks to bridge theseExpand
A postmodern Pandora's box: anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet.
TLDR
Arguments around the themes of safety and effectiveness, alternative medicine, civil liberties, conspiracy theories, and morality were found on the majority of websites analyzed; misinformation was also prevalent. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...