Corpus ID: 35362446

Online Lurkers Tell Why

@inproceedings{Nonnecke2004OnlineLT,
  title={Online Lurkers Tell Why},
  author={Blair Nonnecke and Jennifer Preece and Dorine Andrews and Russell Voutour},
  booktitle={AMCIS},
  year={2004}
}
A Web-based survey of 375 Microsoft Network (MSN) online communities was undertaken to investigate why people do not publicly participate in online discussion groups, i.e., lurk. The most popular reason for lurking, “just reading/browsing is enough”, was noted by more than half of the lurkers (53.9%). Apparently, many lurkers get their needs met through observation rather than public participation. The next but much less prominent reason for lurking is “still learning about the group” (29.7… Expand

Tables and Topics from this paper

Understanding lurkers in online communities: A literature review
TLDR
This study first explains why people participate in online communities by building an integrated model of motivational factors of online behaviors, and identifies four types of lurking reasons: environmental influence, personal preference, individual-group relationship and security consideration. Expand
Lurking: a challenge or a fruitful strategy? A comparison between lurkers and active participants in an online corporate community of practice
TLDR
A study comparing lurkers and active participants of an online corporate CoP indicates that lurkers use the obtained knowledge on the job and therefore cannot simply be considered free-riders, and suggests that lurking as a learning strategy confirms the microlearning hypothesis. Expand
Posters versus Lurkers: Improving Participation in Enterprise Social Networks through Promotional Messages
TLDR
A model that examines four key motivations of posting and lurking is developed and finds that posters and lurkers are motivated and hindered by different factors. Expand
Online Communities: researching sociability and usability in hard to reach populations
  • J. Preece
  • Computer Science, Engineering
  • Australas. J. Inf. Syst.
  • 2004
TLDR
The first analyses why people do not actively participate in online discussions, i.e., lurk, and a new project to develop cross-cultural online book communities for children across the world who do not speak each other’s languages is discussed. Expand
FROM ACTIVE LURKERS TO COMMUNITY LEADER: WHO THEY ARE AND WHAT THEY DO
In this study, an email-based community supporting a community of practice (CoP) of mathematic teachers was investigated. Public messages members send were examined in order to determine whatExpand
Beyond Lurking: The Invisible Follower-Feeder In An Online Community Ecosystem
TLDR
It is argued that the online community is best seen as part of a larger, polycontextual community ecosystem, comprising diverse online and offline contexts – community engagement spaces – and that the nature of value of roles in this ecosystem is best understood by focusing on understanding cross-boundary social activity and knowledge transfer, rather than by investigating online interactions only. Expand
Active Lurking: Enhancing the Value of In-House Online Communities Through the Related Practices Around the Online Communities
In this paper we examine the possibility of evaluating the value of an online community in a company by focusing on the practices around the online community, which we call active lurking. We dividedExpand
Lurking: Legitimate or Illegitimate Peripheral Participation?
TLDR
It is concluded that lurking as legitimate or illegitimate peripheral participation is context-dependent and a more complex, nuanced activity than previously theorized and measured. Expand
Broadening the notion of participation in online discussions: examining patterns in learners’ online listening behaviors
While a great deal of research has studied the messages students contribute to electronic discussion forums, productive participation in online learning conversations requires more than just makingExpand
Reading a Blog When Empowered to Comment: Posting, Lurking, and Non-Interactive Reading
TLDR
The findings suggest that the increasing trend for websites to enable posted responses may benefit not only readers' engagement but their comprehension as well and that lurkers may comprehend differently from readers who are not empowered to post. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 22 REFERENCES
What lurkers and posters think of each other [online community]
  • B. Nonnecke, J. Preece, D. Andrews
  • Psychology, Computer Science
  • 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the
  • 2004
TLDR
The results of the analysis indicate that posters and lurkers go online for similar reasons, but lurkers were less enthusiastic about the benefits of community membership and perceived a greater than expected benefit. Expand
The active lurker: influence of an in-house online community on its outside environment
In this study, we focus on participants called lurkers, who do not post any messages in an online community such as interactive mailing lists and bulletin board systems. We propose a method ofExpand
WHY LURKERS LURK
The goal of this paper is to address the question: ‘why do lurkers lurk?’ Lurkers reportedly makeup the majority of members in online groups, yet little is known about them. Without insight intoExpand
Lurker demographics: counting the silent
TLDR
This paper presents a demographic study of lurking in email-based discussion lists (DLs) with an emphasis on health and software-support DLs, finding that health-supportDLs have on average significantly fewer lurkers than software- support DLs. Expand
Shedding Light on Lurkers in Online Communities
Lurkers are reported to make up a sizable proportion of many online communities, yet little is known about their reasons for lurking, who they are, and how they lurk. In this study, interviews withExpand
De-lurking in virtual communities: a social communication network approach to measuring the effects of social and cultural capital
TLDR
A novel way of measuring social and cultural capital, situational antecedents of lurking and de-lurking is proposed and some directions towards measuring active participation in virtual communities are provided. Expand
Electronic Survey Methodology: A Case Study in Reaching Hard-to-Involve Internet Users
TLDR
Quality criteria for electronic survey design and use based on an investigation of recent electronic survey literature are presented and suggest how the use of some criteria may conflict and what researchers may experience when conducting electronic surveys in an online culture in which people are not tolerant of intrusions into online lives. Expand
Communities in Cyberspace
From the Publisher: In cyberspace, communication and co-ordination is cheap, fast, and global. With powerful new tools for interacting and organizing in the hands of millions of people worldwide,Expand
Why observing a dialogue may benefit learning
TLDR
A high-level ‘process model’ of learning is presented and then a more detailed model of what happens in educational dialogues is presented, arguing that in ordinary conversation the first aspect dominates while in educationalDialogues, many misunderstandings arise from the need for more emphasis on explicit demonstration of use of rules. Expand
Vicarious learning from dialogue and discourse -- A controlled comparison
This study examined learning in the domain of sentence parsing and syntax tree-diagram construction. The aim of the study was to assess whether subjects could learn ‘vicariously’ from recordings ofExpand
...
1
2
3
...