• DOI:10.1057/JIRD.2009.31
• Corpus ID: 55091039

On the transformation of warfare: a plausibility probe of the new war thesis

@article{Heupel2010OnTT,
  title={On the transformation of warfare: a plausibility probe of the new war thesis},
  author={Monika Heupel and Bernhard Zangl},
  journal={Journal of International Relations and Development},
  year={2010},
  volume={13},
  pages={26-58}
}

• M. Heupel, Bernhard Zangl
• Published 19 February 2010
• Political Science, History
• Journal of International Relations and Development

This article intends to contribute to the debate on the emergence of so-called new wars by reconstructing the new war thesis in a way that allows an empirical assessment of the plausibility of the thesis. It makes explicit the defining criteria implicit to the new war thesis which claims that a fundamental transformation of modern intra-state warfare has taken place due to the end of the Cold War. It also lays out the causal mechanisms that underpin the alleged transformation of warfare. Based on the reconstructed conceptual framework and drawing on case studies of the wars in Cambodia, Afghanistan, Angola, Somalia and Sierra Leone, the article then lends support to the new war thesis. The cases demonstrate that, in the 1990s, war economies based on criminal activities became more important and triggered the fragmentation of warring parties and the economisation of their war motives. Moreover, in combination, the fragmentation of warring parties and the economisation of their war motives facilitate the application of brutal violence against civilians.