On the shape of the probability weighting function.

Abstract

Empirical studies have shown that decision makers do not usually treat probabilities linearly. Instead, people tend to overweight small probabilities and underweight large probabilities. One way to model such distortions in decision making under risk is through a probability weighting function. We present a nonparametric estimation procedure for assessing the probability weighting function and value function at the level of the individual subject. The evidence in the domain of gains supports a two-parameter weighting function, where each parameter is given a psychological interpretation: one parameter measures how the decision maker discriminates probabilities, and the other parameter measures how attractive the decision maker views gambling. These findings are consistent with a growing body of empirical and theoretical work attempting to establish a psychological rationale for the probability weighting function.

Extracted Key Phrases

2 Figures and Tables

Showing 1-10 of 72 references

Risk attitudes and decision weights

  • A Tversky, P Wakker
  • 1995
Highly Influential
4 Excerpts

Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability

  • C F Camerer, T H Ho
  • 1994
Highly Influential
4 Excerpts

Nonlinear decision weights in choice under uncertainty

  • G Wu, R Gonzalez
  • 1999

A belief-based account of decision under uncertainty

  • C Fox, A Tversky
  • 1998

Accepted November

  • 1998
Showing 1-10 of 262 extracted citations
02040'00'02'04'06'08'10'12'14'16
Citations per Year

494 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has received between 395 and 617 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.