On the other hand am I rational? Hemispheric activation and the framing effect

@article{McElroy2004OnTO,
  title={On the other hand am I rational? Hemispheric activation and the framing effect},
  author={Todd McElroy and John J. Seta},
  journal={Brain and Cognition},
  year={2004},
  volume={55},
  pages={572-580}
}

Tables from this paper

Framing effects: The influence of handedness and access to right hemisphere processing

Although mixed- and strong-handed participants were affected differently, the results were not consistent with the hypothesis that stable brain differences may account for differences in susceptibility to framing effects.

Enhanced activation of the left hemisphere promotes normative decision making

It is shown that enhanced activation of the left hemisphere also reduces violations of other normative principles, besides the invariance principle, which suggest that hemispheric asymmetries can affect higher-order cognitive processes, such as decision-making biases.

Affective imposition influences risky choice: Handedness points to the hemispheres

The results of the framing task and handedness questionnaire showed that participants' degree of handedness significantly influenced the positive/negative valence they imposed onto theframing task as well as their level of risk preference.

Hemispheric activation and interaction: Past activity affects future performance

Greater left hemisphere activity interfered most with performance of the letter- matching task and was more pronounced in the early learning stage and male participants were most affected by this effect.

Making estimates and sensitivity to anchors: Exploring the role of hemispheric processing

This paper provided participants with both a positive and negatively valenced anchoring task and predicted stronger anchoring effects under conditions of hemispheric-valence consistency and based on the valence hypothesis, the former hypothesis supported but the latter did not.

Activation of the DLPFC Reveals an Asymmetric Effect in Risky Decision Making: Evidence from a tDCS Study

An asymmetric effect of right/left DLPFC when the participants faced gains and losses was revealed, which partially provided the neural evidence and a feasible paradigm to help better understand risky decision making and loss aversion.

Does lateral attention affect health behavior?: investigating hemispheric influences in framed health messages.

The current study was designed to test whether the systematic/contextual perspective would successfully account for lateralized responses to framed health messages. Accordingly, gain or loss framed

Attribute Framing Effect as a Function of Selective Auditory Frequency Amplification

A set of cognitive biases that have been associated with functional asymmetry of the brain’s hemispheres are framing effects. The attribute framing effect is when valenced descriptive messages –

Framing susceptibility in a risky choice game is altered by galvanic vestibular stimulation

It is proposed that GVS results in increased reliance on the affect heuristic by means of activation of cortical and subcortical vestibular-emotional brain structures and that this effect is modulated by the lateralization of the Vestibular cortex.

Semantic processing in the left versus right cerebral hemispheres following unilateral hand contractions

Prior research reported enhanced verbal creativity as measured by performance on remote associate problems in Hebrew from left-hand contractions (right-hemisphere activation), which was extended to English problems and to homograph interpretation.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 70 REFERENCES

Processing Persuasive Arguments: 2. Discounting of Truth and Relevance as a Function of Agreement and Manipulated Activation Asymmetry

Abstract Previous research has demonstrated greater attention toward arguments with which one disagrees, increased recall and recognition for arguments with which one disagrees, and greater

The Role of Hemispheric Activation in Person Perception: Evidence for an Attentional Focus Model

Results of both studies supported an attentional focus model of hemispheric differences in person perception as opposed to a stereotyping/individuating model and implications for dual process models of social perception are discussed.

Self-serving biases in causal attributions as a function of altered activation asymmetry.

There was significantly greater self-serving bias (attribution of internal, stable, and global causes for positive events and external, unstable, and specific causes for negative events) during left hemisphere than during right hemisphere relative activation.

Sex differences in cognitive/motor overload in reaction time tasks

Individual differences in relative hemispheric alpha abundance and cognitive responses to persuasive communications.

Three experiments are reported investigating individual differences in interhemispheric electroencephalogram (EEG) activity and cognitive responses to persuasion, supporting the expectation that as subjects thought longer about attitude issues they exhibited a shifting of relative hemispheric EEG activity from the left toward the right parietal areas of the cerebral hemispheres.

Conceptions of own versus others' outcomes: Manipulation by monaural attentional orientation

Previous research found that greater personal optimism was produced during selective left hemisphere activation. In that research the selective activation was manipulated by contralateral visual

Material specific hemispherical arousal

Cerebrally Lateralized Mental Representations of Hand Shape and Movement

Each hemisphere could represent the shape and movement of the contralateral hand but could not for the ipsilateral hand, concluding that Mentally simulating one’s action and discriminating body part handedness both depend on lateralized sensorimotor and somatosensory representations.
...