On the moral and legal status of abortion.

@article{Warren1973OnTM,
  title={On the moral and legal status of abortion.},
  author={M. Warren},
  journal={The Monist},
  year={1973},
  volume={57 1},
  pages={
          43-61
        }
}
  • M. Warren
  • Published 1973
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • The Monist
1 We will be concerned with both the moral status of abortion, which for our purposes we may define as the act that a woman performs in voluntarily terminating, or allowing another person to terminate, her pregnancy, and the legal status that is appropriate for this act. I will argue that, while it is not possible to produce a satisfactory defense of a woman’s right to obtain an abortion without showing that a fetus is not a human being, in the morally relevant sense of that term, we ought not… Expand

Topics from this paper

The Moral Rights of the Embryo
The question concerning the moral rights of the embryo is, indeed, the question of its moral status. If it has any moral rights they should be firmly protected. If it has not, then it seems there isExpand
Abortion and Argument by Analogy
The purpose of this essay is to examine the consistency and coherence of some arguments about abortion. Theological, philosophical, and public policy discussions of abortion are linked by theExpand
ONE The Wrong of Abortion
Much of the public debate about abortion concerns the question whether deliberate feticide ought to be unlawful, at least in most circumstances. We will lay that question aside here in order to focusExpand
Abortion and the concept of a person.
  • J. English
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Canadian journal of philosophy
  • 1975
TLDR
This paper concludes that no single criterion can capture the concept of a person and no sharp line can be drawn and it is argued that if a fetus is a person, abortion is still justifiable in many cases; and if aetus is not a people, killing it is still wrong in many Cases. Expand
Abortion, Persons, and Futures of Value
I In a very widely anthologized article, Don Marquis offers an argument claiming to establish that the “overwhelming majority of deliberate abortions are seriously immoral” (Marquis 1989, 183). LikeExpand
Self-Ownership and Abortion
This paper argues that in the absence of general duties to rescue a woman may, at any time, terminate an unintended pregnancy even if the foetus is a person. However the rights of the foetus restrictExpand
A dualist analysis of abortion: personhood and the concept of self qua experiential subject
  • K. Himma
  • Medicine, Psychology
  • Journal of Medical Ethics
  • 2005
TLDR
It is argued that, under dualist assumptions about the nature of mind, the fetus is not a person until brain activity has begun, and that a dualist can take the position that abortion ought to be legally permitted at least until the beginning of brain activity in the fetus. Expand
A defense of abortion
David Boonin has written the most thorough and detailed case for the moral permissibility of abortion yet published. Critically examining a wide range of arguments that attempt to prove that everyExpand
The Complex Problem of Abortion
The problem of the morality of abortion is one of the most complex and controversial in the entire field of applied ethics. It may therefore appear rather surprising that the most popular proposedExpand
Even If the Fetus is Not a Person, Abortion is Immoral: The Impairment Argument
TLDR
The premises of this argument are defended against a plethora of objections, concluding that they either do not work, or commit their proponent to a controversial position. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...