On the empirical relevance of Condorcet’s paradox

@article{Deemen2014OnTE,
  title={On the empirical relevance of Condorcet’s paradox},
  author={A. V. Deemen},
  journal={Public Choice},
  year={2014},
  volume={158},
  pages={311-330}
}
  • A. V. Deemen
  • Published 2014
  • Economics
  • Public Choice
  • Condorcet’s paradox occurs when there is no alternative that beats every other alternative by majority. The paradox may pose real problems to democratic decision making such as decision deadlocks and democratic paralysis. However, its relevance has been discussed again and again since the celebrated works of Arrow (Social choice and individual values, 1963) and Black (The theory of committees and elections, 1958). The discussion varies from one extreme to the other: from very relevant to… CONTINUE READING
    15 Citations
    Trump, Condorcet and Borda: Voting paradoxes in the 2016 Republican presidential primaries
    • 10
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    A commonsense assessment of Arrow’s theorem
    • PDF
    The Smoothed Possibility of Social Choice
    • L. Xia
    • Computer Science, Economics
    • NeurIPS
    • 2020
    • 2
    • PDF
    Axioms for Defeat in Democratic Elections
    • 2
    • PDF
    Bargaining in the Presence of Condorcet Cycles: The Role of Asymmetries
    • 1
    • PDF
    Political actors playing games: Theory and experiments
    • 4
    • PDF
    An Analysis of Random Elections with Large Numbers of Voters
    • 1
    • PDF
    Two Possible Paradoxes in Numerical Comparisons of Optimization Algorithms
    • 1