On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure.

@article{Colquitt2001OnTD,
  title={On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure.},
  author={Jason A. Colquitt},
  journal={The Journal of applied psychology},
  year={2001},
  volume={86 3},
  pages={
          386-400
        }
}
  • J. Colquitt
  • Published 1 June 2001
  • Business
  • The Journal of applied psychology
This study explores the dimensionality of organizational justice and provides evidence of construct validity for a new justice measure. Items for this measure were generated by strictly following the seminal works in the justice literature. The measure was then validated in 2 separate studies. Study 1 occurred in a university setting, and Study 2 occurred in a field setting using employees in an automobile parts manufacturing company. Confirmatory factor analyses supported a 4-factor structure… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

AN INVESTIGATION OF VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF FOUR-FACTOR ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE SCALE

The purpose of the present study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Organizational Justice Scale, developed by Colquitt (2001). This scale administered to a sample working in an

Test of the Construct and Criteria Validity of a German Measure of Organizational Justice

Organizational justice is a well-known and increasingly often measured construct in work-related psychological research, for which, however, different kinds of measures are used. Colquitt (2001)

Examining the Dimensionality of Colquitt's Organizational Justice Scale in a Public Health Sector Context

The procedural and informational justice dimensions were highly correlated, but confirmatory factor analysis showed that a four-Factor solution provided a better fit than a three-factor solution.

A Step toward a Common Measure of Organizational Fairness

The paper examines dimensions of organizational justice construct in a public sector context, utilizing an organizational justice measure developed and validated by Colquitt (2001). The present study

Psychometric Properties of a Four-Component Norwegian Organizational Justice Scale

The results demonstrate that the Norwegian Organizational Justice Scale is a reliable and construct-valid measure of organizational justice in a Norwegian setting.

A New Dimension of Organizational Justice: Procedural Voice

Dimensionality of the Colquitt justice measures was investigated across a wide range of service occupations and found support for the 4-factor model of justice, although significant improvement of model fit was obtained by including a new latent variable, “procedural voice,” which taps employees' desire to express their views and feelings and influence results.

The relative importance of organizational justice dimensions on employee outcomes: a critical reanalysis using relative weights analysis

This study examined the collected research on the four dimensions of organizational justice (i.e., distributive, procedural, interpersonal, and informational) by reanalyzing data taken from Colquitt,

Dimensionality of Organizational Justice in a Call Center Context

A three-factor model of distributive, procedural, and informational justice provided the best fit to call center data and implies that dimensionality of organizational justice is more context-dependent than previously thought.

A Step toward a Common Measure of Organizational Justice

Dimensions of the organizational justice construct were examined in a public sector context utilizing an organizational justice measure developed by Colquitt in 2001 and there was evidence of a new factor called procedural-voice justice that taps a possible association with the concept of voice.

Organizational Justice Dimensions: Validation of an Arabic Measure

There is a continued debate regarding the dimensions of organizational justice. The present project investigated the dimensionality of organizational justice and the validity of an Arabic measure of
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 82 REFERENCES

Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.

It is suggested that although different justice dimensions are moderately to highly related, they contribute incremental variance explained in fairness perceptions and illustrate the overall and unique relationships among distributive, procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice and several organizational outcomes.

Advances in Organizational Justice

SUMMARY As Figure 1.3 illustrates, several important theories of orga-nizational justice can be arrayed in a 2 x 2 matrix. We do not want to imply by this characterization, however, that all four

Workers' evaluations of the "ends" and the "means": An examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice.

Abstract Although research has now demonstrated that both distributive and procedural justice are important, little work has been done to examine how they may interrelate in the prediction of

Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow

The present article chronicles the history of the field of organizational justice, identifies current themes, and recommends new directions for the future. A historical overview of the field focuses

GAINSHARING AND MUTUAL MONITORING: A COMBINED AGENCY-ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE INTERPRETATION

This study examines the behavioral consequences of “gainsharing” using a theoretical framework that includes elements of agency and organizational justice theory. We propose that when gainsharing is

The Perceptions of Fair Interpersonal Treatment Scale: development and validation of a measure of interpersonal treatment in the workplace.

Analyses of the factor structure and reliability of this new instrument indicate that the PFIT scale is a reliable instrument composed of 2 factors: supervisor treatment and coworker treatment.

Interactional, Formal, and Distributive Justice in the Workplace: An Exploratory Study

Abstract Researchers have suggested that procedural justice is a more important determinant of most organizational outcomes than distributive justice. Following recent theoretical developments on

JUSTICE AS A MEDIATOR OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN METHODS OF MONITORING AND ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR

This study examined relationships among three methods of leader monitoring, employee perceptions of workplace justice, and employee citizenship behavior. We hypothesized that monitoring would

LEADERSHIP TRAINING IN ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE TO INCREASE CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR WITHIN A LABOR UNION: A REPLICATION

In a replication of a quasi-experiment by Skarlicki and Latham (1996), we investigated the effect of training union leaders (N= 25) in the administration of organizational justice principles on union

Delay of Gratification as a Moderator of the Procedural Justice Distributive Justice Relationship

The present study examined the hypothesis that procedural justice and distributive justice are positively related. In other words, when individuals perceive fairness in how decisions are made, they
...