On the Supposed Obligation to Relieve Famine

@article{Kekes2002OnTS,
  title={On the Supposed Obligation to Relieve Famine},
  author={John Kekes},
  journal={Philosophy},
  year={2002},
  volume={77},
  pages={503 - 517}
}
  • J. Kekes
  • Published 2002
  • Philosophy
  • Philosophy
In an influential paper, Peter Singer claims that affluent people have a strong obligation to relieve famine. If they fail, they allow others to die, and makes them murderers. In responding to this outrageous claim, which has given uneasy conscience to many, I show that Singer is engaged in indefensible moralizing that substitutes bullying for reasoned argument and gives a bad name to morality. 
15 Citations
A Defence of Prudential Moralism
Moralism is often charged with being ineffective, rude, hypocritical, and intolerant. This article challenges all of those claims, first using evidence from social science to argue that moralism canExpand
The self-fulfilling prophecies and global inequality
In this paper I will discuss the causes of global inequality. I will argue that there may be other important reasons for poverty than Western selfishness. Further, I will claim that most WesternExpand
Justice and the Possibility of Good Moralism in Bioethics
  • M. Häyry
  • Medicine
  • Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
  • 2019
TLDR
The conceptual background of moralism especially in the consequentialist tradition is explored, cases of allegedly bad moralism are presented, six approaches to justice are introduced, and it is argued that these approaches question the prevailing views on the goodness and badness ofmoralism in its various forms. Expand
Duties of Rescue: a Moderate Account
Peter Singer’s famine-relief argument forces attention upon a class of requirements that make demands of an interesting kind. These are requirements to rescue another when hardly anything is at stakeExpand
AUTONOMY AND DUTIES TO DISTANT STRANGERS
One way of arguing for the position that states may prioritize their own citizens over foreigners draws attention to the ways in which states limit their citizens' autonomy. States routinely coerceExpand
Can Theories of Global Justice Be Useful in Humanitarian Response?
  • K. Simm
  • Medicine
  • Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees
  • 2018
TLDR
It is argued that theories of global justice can be beneficial for humanitarian causes, not in a comprehensive and consistent "all-or-nothing" manner, but rather on a case-by-case basis and through selective application of particular arguments. Expand
Why Do We Disagree about our Obligations to the Poor?
  • P. Seipel
  • Political Science
  • Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
  • 2019
People disagree about whether individuals in rich countries like the United States have an obligation to aid the world’s poorest people. A tempting thought is that this disagreement comes down to aExpand
The Political Accountability Approach
This chapter develops a political approach to famine. The approach is based on ethical deliberations of humanitarian accountability which support the argument that governments must carry the coreExpand
Draining the pond: why Singer’s defense of the duty to aid the world’s poor is self-defeating
Peter Singer’s defense of the duty to aid the world’s poor by the pond analogy is self-defeating. It cannot be both true that you ought to save the drowning child from a pond at the expense ofExpand
Moral responsibility for unprevented harm
That we are morally responsible for what we do willingly and knowingly is a commonplace. That our moral responsibility extends as far as to cover at least the intended consequences of our voluntaryExpand
...
1
2
...