• DOI:10.3847/2041-8213/aad9f4
• Corpus ID: 119378351

On the Spatial Coherence of Magnetic Ejecta: Measurements of Coronal Mass Ejections by Multiple Spacecraft Longitudinally Separated by 0.01 au

@article{Lugaz2018OnTS,
  title={On the Spatial Coherence of Magnetic Ejecta: Measurements of Coronal Mass Ejections by Multiple Spacecraft Longitudinally Separated by 0.01 au},
  author={No{\'e} Lugaz and Charles J. Farrugia and R{\'e}ka M. Winslow and Nada Al-Haddad and Antoinette B. Galvin and Teresa Nieves‐Chinchilla and Christina O. Lee and Miho Janvier},
  journal={The Astrophysical Journal Letters},
  year={2018},
  volume={864}
}

• N. Lugaz, C. Farrugia, +5 authors M. Janvier
• Published 29 August 2018
• Physics
• The Astrophysical Journal Letters

Measurements of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) by multiple spacecraft at small radial separations but larger longitudinal separations is one of the ways to learn about the three-dimensional structure of CMEs. Here, we take advantage of the orbit of the Wind spacecraft that ventured to distances of up to 0.012 au from the Sun–Earth line during 2000–2002. Combined with measurements from the Advanced Composition Experiment, which is in a tight halo orbit around L1, the multipoint measurements allow us to investigate how the magnetic field inside magnetic ejecta (MEs) changes on scales of 0.005–0.012 au. We identify 21 CMEs measured by these two spacecraft for longitudinal separations of 0.007 au or more. We find that the time-shifted correlation between 30 minute averages of the non-radial magnetic field components measured at the two spacecraft is systematically above 0.97 when the separation is 0.008 au or less, but is on average 0.89 for greater separations. Overall, these newly analyzed measurements, combined with 14 additional ones when the spacecraft separation is smaller, point toward a scale length of longitudinal magnetic coherence inside MEs of 0.25–0.35 au for the magnitude of the magnetic field, but 0.06–0.12 au for the magnetic field components. This finding raises questions about the very nature of MEs. It also highlights the need for additional “mesoscale” multipoint measurements of CMEs with longitudinal separations of 0.01–0.2 au.