On the Relevance of Theoretical Results to Voting System Choice

@inproceedings{Nurmi2012OnTR,
  title={On the Relevance of Theoretical Results to Voting System Choice},
  author={H. Nurmi},
  year={2012}
}
The first systematic comparisons of voting procedures appeared in the 1970’s. The journal Behavioral Science became a major forum for these early publications. Especially notable are the article by Fishburn (1971) and a series of works by Jeffrey T. Richelson. This series culminated in a summary (Richelson 1979) that is perhaps the most extensive of its kind in terms of both the number of systems and the number of criteria. 
19 Citations
The Black Rule is Best!
Formal Verification of Voting Schemes
  • PDF
Reason vs. Rationality: From Rankings to Tournaments in Individual Choice
  • 1
How frequently do different voting rules encounter voting paradoxes in three-candidate elections?
  • 37
Aspects of Power Overlooked by Power Indices
  • 5
  • PDF
...
1
2
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 60 REFERENCES
An assessment of voting system simulations
  • 54
A comparative-analysis of social choice functions, I, II, III: A summary
  • 42
A Computer Simulation of the Paradox of Voting
  • 60
On the probability of electing the Condorcet
  • 25
Review of paradoxes afflicting various voting procedures where one out of m candidates (m ≥ 2) must be elected
  • 10
  • PDF
Making Multicandidate Elections More Democratic
  • 29
Discrepancies in the outcomes resulting from different voting schemes
  • 31
Sophisticated voting outcomes and agenda control
  • 298
Condorcet's paradox
  • 156
...
1
2
3
4
5
...