On the Ramsey Test without Triviality

@article{Leitgeb2010OnTR,
  title={On the Ramsey Test without Triviality},
  author={Hannes Leitgeb},
  journal={Notre Dame J. Formal Log.},
  year={2010},
  volume={51},
  pages={21-54}
}
  • H. Leitgeb
  • Published 2010
  • Philosophy
  • Notre Dame J. Formal Log.
We present a way of classifying the logically possible ways out of Gärdenfors’ inconsistency or triviality result on belief revision with conditionals. For one of these ways—conditionals which are not descriptive but which only have an inferential role as being given by the Ramsey test—we determine which of the assumptions in three different versions of Gärdenfors’ theorem turn out to be false. This is done by constructing ranked models in which such Ramsey-test conditionals are evaluated and… 
A semantic-modal view on Ramsey’s test
TLDR
A semantic analysis of the Ramsey test is presented, pointing out its deep underlying flaw: the tension between the “static” nature of AGM revision and the fact that any Ramsey conditional must be a modal operator (more precisely, a dynamic-epistemic one).
Reapproaching Ramsey: Conditionals and Iterated Belief Change in the Spirit of AGM
  • H. Rott
  • Philosophy
    J. Philos. Log.
  • 2011
TLDR
It is argued that it is possible to endorse that Ramsey test for conditionals while staying true to the spirit of AGM and that it has been wrong right from the start to expect that Preservation holds in languages containing nested conditionals.
On the Ramsey Test Analysis of ‘Because’
The well-known formal semantics of conditionals due to Stalnaker (in: Rescher (ed) Studies in logical theory, Blackwell, Oxford, 1968), Lewis (Counterfactuals, Blackwell, Oxford, 1973a), and
Indicative Conditionals and Graded Information
TLDR
An account of indicative conditionals that combines features of minimal change semantics and information semantics, and captures three important facts: that a conditional is logically independent from its antecedent; that a sequence of antecedents behaves like a single conjunctive antecedence; and that conditionals restrict the quantification domain of epistemic modals.
Lewis’ Triviality for Quasi Probabilities
TLDR
The paper proves Lewis’ triviality for quasi probabilities and discusses how this has implications for three other prominent strategies to avoid Lewis' triviality, which additionally mimic probabilistic additivity and conditionalisation.
Interpreting enthymematic arguments using belief revision
TLDR
This paper suggests replacing the usual find-the-missing-premise approaches by an approach based on systematic efforts to ascribe a belief state to the author against the background of which the argument has to be evaluated.
HYPE: A System of Hyperintensional Logic (with an Application to Semantic Paradoxes)
TLDR
HYPE is found to relate in interesting ways to classical logic and various systems of relevance and paraconsistent logic, many-valued logic, and truthmaker semantics, and may be used as a general logical framework in which different systems of logic can be studied, compared, and combined.
An analysis of disposition concepts by the Ramsey test
This is an essay on the understanding of disposition concepts, which exploits the Ramsey test semantics of conditionals for a refined conditional analysis of dispositions. I will show that this
Dynamic Epistemic Logic Part I : Modeling Knowledge and Belief
The first to propose a (modal) logic of knowledge and belief was Jaako Hintikka in his seminal book Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions, published in 1962. However,
The foundations of metacognition
METACOGNITION IN NON-HUMAN ANIMALS 1. Evidence for Animal Metaminds 2. Validating Animal Models of Metacognition 3. Are Birds Metacognitive? 4. Seeking Information in Nonhuman Animals: Weaving a
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 26 REFERENCES
The Ramsey Test and the Indexicality of Conditionals: A Proposed Resolution of Gärdenfors' Paradox
TLDR
It is shown how to accommodate the full Ramsey test for conditional sentences, thus allowing for unlimited iteration of conditionals, and the conclusion is that there is no real conflict between Preservation and the Ramsey test — once the authors take the context dependency of epistemic conditionals into account.
A Note On An Impossibility Theorem of Gardenfors
Suppose that it makes sense to talk about theory addition: If a proposition A is added to a theory T the result is again a theory, T + A. While some philosophers may query the usefulness of a notion
A Counterexample to Six Fundamental Principles of Belief Formation
TLDR
The counterexample described in this paper suggests that a number of the most cherished of these principles should not be regarded as valid for commonsense reasoning.
Conditionals and the Ramsey test
Frank Plumpton Ramsey (1903–1930)—the brilliant Cambridge philosopher whose short but very intensive career started when he was still a teenager only to be interrupted by his untimely death about a
On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial Meet Contraction and Revision Functions
TLDR
The authors investigate "partial meet contraction functions", which are defined to yield the intersection of some nonempty family of maximal subsets of the theory that fail to imply the proposition being eliminated, and basic properties of these functions are established.
Dynamic logic for belief revision
  • J. Benthem
  • Philosophy
    J. Appl. Non Class. Logics
  • 2007
TLDR
This work shows how belief revision can be treated systematically in the format of dynamicepistemic logic, when operators of conditional belief are added, and obtains complete logics for concrete mechanisms of belief revision based on compositional reduction axioms.
Ordinal Conditional Functions: A Dynamic Theory of Epistemic States
Many of the philosophically most interesting notions are overtly or covertly epistemological. Overtly epistemological notions are, of course, the concept of belief itself, the concept of subjective
Beliefs in conditionals vs. conditional beliefs
On the basis of impossibility results on probability, belief revision, and conditionals, it is argued that conditional beliefs differ from beliefs in conditionals qua mental states. Once this is
Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Preferential Models and Cumulative Logics
...
...