On the Evolutionary Origin of Prospect Theory Preferences

  title={On the Evolutionary Origin of Prospect Theory Preferences},
  author={Rose McDermott and James H. Fowler and Oleg Smirnov},
  journal={The Journal of Politics},
  pages={335 - 350}
Prospect theory scholars have identified important human decision-making biases, but they have been conspicuously silent on the question of the origin of these biases. Here we create a model that shows preferences consistent with prospect theory may have an origin in evolutionary psychology. Specifically, we derive a model from risk-sensitive optimal foraging theory to generate an explanation for the origin and function of context-dependent risk aversion and risk-seeking behavior. Although this… 

Hierarchical Evolutionary Preferences Explain Discrepancies in Expected Utility Theory

An evolutionary principal-agent model is developed in which individuals maximize a set of proximal choice variables, the interests of which are aligned with fitness, and it is shown that age-specific demographic rates can be used as choice variables.

Prospect Theory and Political Decision Making

  • B. Vis
  • Economics
    Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics
  • 2019
Risk is a central feature of political decision making. Prospect theory, an empirically correct theory of choice under risk that deals precisely with this condition, therefore seems to have much to

The Evolutionary Explanation of What?

  • B. Autzen
  • Economics
    Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics
  • 2018
The paper examines evolutionary explanations of risk preferences. First, the paper argues that evolutionary psychology is ill-suited for explaining prospect theory risk preferences since the

Three Theories of Choice and Their Psychology of Losses

  • Tomás LejarragaR. Hertwig
  • Psychology
    Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
  • 2021
Three theories of how people make decisions under risk and, as a consequence, value potential losses are reviewed: expected-utility theory, prospect theory, and risk-sensitivity theory.

Historical Institutionalism the Cognitive Foundations of Cooperation

  • S. Steinmo
  • Economics
    Public Performance & Management Review
  • 2019
Abstract This essay argues that in order to understand how institutions shape political choices and history we should go further toward understanding the interactive relationships between

An Evolutionary Model of Bounded Rationality and Intelligence

A simple binary-choice model is developed that shows how intelligence can emerge via selection, why it may be bounded, and how such bounds typically imply the coexistence of multiple levels and types of intelligence as a reflection of varying environmental conditions.

Distinctive Preferences Toward Risk in the Substantive Domain of Sociality

As with standard models of rationality, theorists generally treat prospect theory's demonstration of risk aversion in gains but risk tolerance in losses as domain-general. Yet evolutionary psychology

The adaptive value of probability distortion and risk-seeking in macaques’ decision-making

It is found that monkeys’ attitude toward risk is only congruent with the simulation when they are facing losses, consistent with the idea that gambling in the loss domain is analogous to deciding in a context of life-threatening challenges where a certain level of risk-seeking behaviour and probability distortion may be adaptive.

Risk attitudes in a changing environment: An evolutionary model of the fourfold pattern of risk preferences.

An evolutionary model of risk-sensitive behavior is built that predicts that risk preferences should be both path dependent and affected by the decision maker's current state, and shows that the fourfold pattern of risk attitudes may be adaptive in an environment in which conditions vary stochastically but are autocorrelated in time.




▪ Abstract Prospect theory is the most influential behavioral theory of choice in the social sciences. Its creators won a Nobel Prize in economics, and it is largely responsible for the booming field

Contrasting Rational and Psychological Analyses of Political Choice

We contrast the rational theory of choice in the form of expected utility theory with descriptive psychological analysis in the form of prospect theory, using problems involving the choice between

Prospect Theory and International Relations: Theoretical Applications and Analytical Problems

In this essay I evaluate the potential contribution of prospect theory to our understanding of international relations. I begin with the implications of loss aversion, the endowment effect, risk

Risk Taking in Latin American Economic Restructuring: Lessons from Prospect Theory

Prospect theory, a psychological theory of decision making that has shed new light on foreign policy choices, maintains that people tend to take high risks when facing losses, while proceeding with

Prospect Theory, Rational Choice, and International Relations

A half-decade after the first systematic applications of prospect theory to international relations, scholars continue to debate its potential utility as a theoretical framework. Key questions

A Cognitive Theory of Deterrence

Prospect theory is an empirical model of choice that stands as the leading alternative to rationality for explaining decisions under conditions of risk. While many still defend the assumption of

The Political Fate of Market Reform in Latin America, Africa, and Eastern Europe

Why did political leaders adopt drastic, costly neoliberal policies in a number of countries, but not in others? Why did these painful measures elicit popular support in some nations, while

Political Competition: Theory and Applications

Political Competition: Theory and Applications. By John E. Roemer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001. 352p. $60.00. John Roemer sets out to slaughter a golden calf of positive political

The logic of risk-sensitive foraging preferences

Better than rational: Evolutionary psychology and the invisible hand

Several years ago, we attended an interdisciplinary seminar on what were purported to be "biases" in negotiation behavior. The economists, psychologists, and biologists present were mulling over the