On ranking controversies in wikipedia: models and evaluation

@inproceedings{Vuong2008OnRC,
  title={On ranking controversies in wikipedia: models and evaluation},
  author={Ba-Quy Vuong and Ee-Peng Lim and Aixin Sun and Minh-Tam Le and Hady W. Lauw},
  booktitle={WSDM '08},
  year={2008}
}
Wikipedia 1 is a very large and successful Web 2.0 example. As the number of Wikipedia articles and contributors grows at a very fast pace, there are also increasing disputes occurring among the contributors. Disputes often happen in articles with controversial content. They also occur frequently among contributors who are "aggressive" or controversial in their personalities. In this paper, we aim to identify controversial articles in Wikipedia. We propose three models, namely the Basic model… Expand

Paper Mentions

Identifying Controversial Wikipedia Articles Using Editor Collaboration Networks
TLDR
A novel controversy model is described that builds on the interaction history of the editors and not only predicts controversy but also sheds light on the process that leads to controversy. Expand
Identifying controversial articles in Wikipedia: a comparative study
TLDR
This work compares five different methods for modelling and identifying controversy within unmarked articles, and discusses some of the unique difficulties and opportunities inherent to the way Wikipedia is produced. Expand
Identifying Controversies in Wikipedia using Support Vector Machines
Wikipedia is a very large and successful Web 2.0 example. As the number of Wikipedia articles and contributors grows at a very fast pace, there are also increasing disputes occurring among theExpand
Identifying Polarized Wikipedia Articles
TLDR
This chapter proposes the exploitation of a novel indicator for the Wikipedia articles’ quality, namely information credibility, and describes a method that captures the polarized information across the article contents in an attempt to infer the amount of credible (i.e., objective) information every article communicates. Expand
Detecting Controversial Articles in Wikipedia
In this paper, we apply graphical models to facilitate quantitative and qualitative investigations into the edit history of articles posted on Wikipedia. Quantitatively, we use the models to measureExpand
Title Computing controversy : Formal model and algorithms fordetecting controversy on Wikipedia and in search queries
Controversy is a complex concept that has been attracting attention of scholars from diverse fields. In the era of Internet and social media, detecting controversy and controversial concepts by theExpand
Computing controversy: Formal model and algorithms for detecting controversy on Wikipedia and in search queries
TLDR
A formal model of controversy is introduced as the basis of computational approaches to detecting controversial concepts and a classification based method for automatic detection of controversial articles and categories in Wikipedia is proposed. Expand
Leveraging editor collaboration patterns in wikipedia
TLDR
This work trains a model using a distant supervision approach to predict the attitude among other editors, who have neither run nor voted in an election, and reveals that the interactions in co-editing articles can accurately predict votes, although there are differences between positive and negative votes. Expand
Controversy detection in Wikipedia using semantic dissimilarity
TLDR
The problem of identifying controversy using natural language processing techniques for the first time is addressed and the technique is deemed useful for automatic identification of conflicts newly introduced into existing article contents, and could prove helpful in making decisions for inclusion or exclusion of controversies under the same topic. Expand
A productive clash of perspectives? The interplay between articles’ and authors’ perspectives and their impact on Wikipedia edits in a controversial domain
TLDR
The authors' findings revealed a selection bias where authors edited mainly articles with perspectives similar to their own viewpoint, and a negative effect of incongruity between authors’ and articles’ perspectives that was pronounced for the pro-alternative medicine articles. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 19 REFERENCES
Measuring article quality in wikipedia: models and evaluation
TLDR
This paper proposes three article quality measurement models that make use of the interaction data between articles and their contributors derived from the article edit history and proposes a model that combines partial reviewership of contributors as they edit various portions of the articles. Expand
Measuring Qualities of Articles Contributed by Online Communities
TLDR
Two models, namely basic model and peer review model, are developed for measuring the qualities of Wikipedia articles and the authorities of their contributors and show that the two models can effectively determine the articles' qualities and contributors' authorities. Expand
Measuring Wikipedia
Wikipedia, an international project that uses Wiki software to collaboratively create an encyclopaedia, is becoming more and more popular. Everyone can directly edit articles and every edit isExpand
Identifying document topics using the Wikipedia category network
TLDR
It is shown that even a simple algorithm that exploits only the titles and categories of Wikipedia articles can characterize documents by Wikipedia categories surprisingly well. Expand
A content-driven reputation system for the wikipedia
TLDR
The results show that the notion of reputation has good predictive value: changes performed by low-reputation authors have a significantly larger than average probability of having poor quality, as judged by human observers, and of being later undone, as measured by the algorithms. Expand
Wikipedia as Participatory Journalism: Reliable Sources? Metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news resource
  • A. Lih
  • Computer Science, Political Science
  • 2004
TLDR
This study examines the growth of Wikipedia and analyzes the crucial technologies and community policies that have enabled the project to prosper, and establishes a set of metrics based on established encyclopedia taxonomies and analyzed the trends in Wikipedia being used as a source. Expand
IR evaluation methods for retrieving highly relevant documents
TLDR
The novel evaluation methods and the case demonstrate that non-dichotomous relevance assessments are applicable in IR experiments, may reveal interesting phenomena, and allow harder testing of IR methods. Expand
Computing trust from revision history
TLDR
This paper explores ways of utilizing the revision history of an article to assess the trustworthiness of the article and uses this revision history-based trust model to assess a chain of successive versions of articles in Wikipedia and evaluated the assessments produced by the model. Expand
Quality in Internet Collective Goods : Zealots and Good Samaritans in the Case of Wikipedia
One important innovation in information and communication technology developed over the past decade was organizational rather than merely technological. Open source production is remarkable becauseExpand
He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia
TLDR
The growth of non-direct work in Wikipedia is examined and the development of tools to characterize conflict and coordination costs in Wikipedia are described, which may inform the design of new collaborative knowledge systems. Expand
...
1
2
...