On Wine Bullshit: Some New Software?*

@article{Quandt2007OnWB,
  title={On Wine Bullshit: Some New Software?*},
  author={Richard E. Quandt},
  journal={Journal of Wine Economics},
  year={2007},
  volume={2},
  pages={129 - 135}
}
  • R. Quandt
  • Published 1 September 2007
  • Art
  • Journal of Wine Economics
The inspiration for the exegesis that follows comes directly from Harry G. Frankfurt, distinguished emeritus professor of philosophy at Princeton University, who recently published an enormously successful essay on the subject of bullshit (Frankfurt, 2005). In the author's view, “One of the most salient features of our culture is that there is so much bullshit. Everyone knows this. Each of us contributes his share. But we tend to take the situation for granted. Most people are rather confident… 

Vino Veritas ” — But what , in Truth , is in the Bottle ? Experience Goods , Fine Wine Ratings , and Wine Knowledge

Fine wines challenge the consumer to know them and form a meaningful willingness to pay (WTP) for them. Recognizing the challenge to the wine consumer’s knowledge of what she is buying, researchers

Willingness to Pay for Wine Bullshit: Some New Estimates

Abstract As part of a classic article in this journal, Richard Quandt identified 123 wine descriptors that he deemed to be bullshit. In this paper, I examine whether wine consumers are willing to pay

Seeking the Veritas about the Vino: fine wine ratings as wine knowledge

Fine wines challenge the consumer to know them and form a meaningful willingness to pay (WTP) for them. Recognizing the challenge to the wine consumer's knowledge of what she is buying, researchers

The Politics of Wine and the Style of Bullshit

Ahmed, Sara. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. New York: Routledge, 2013. Print. Frankfurt, Harry G., and George Wilson. On Bullshit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 2005. Print. Fredal, James.

Learning Winespeak from Mind Map of Wine Blogs

The use of wine related expressions collected from the internet and clustered to generate mind maps is proposed and it is shown that these expressions are often subjective, with different people having using different expressions for the same wine.

Uncovering the language of wine experts

A method for probing the language of wine reviews is proposed, and thus offer a means to enhance current vocabularies, and as a by-product question the general assumption that wine reviews are gibberish.

Debunking Critics' Wine Words: Can Amateurs Distinguish the Smell of Asphalt from the Taste of Cherries?*

Abstract I report my tests of the hypothesis that wine consumers cannot match critics' descriptions of wines with the wines themselves. My results suggest that testers' ability to match the

Do More Expensive Wines Taste Better? Evidence from a Large Sample of Blind Tastings*

Abstract Individuals who are unaware of the price do not derive more enjoyment from more expensive wine. In a sample of more than 6,000 blind tastings, we find that the correlation between price and

Robert M. Parker: Parker's Wine Bargains: The World's Greatest Wine Values Under $25, Simon & Schuster, New York 2009, 512 pp., ISBN: 1439101906 (paperback), $17.99

[Disclosure: I am the co-author of The Wine Trials, another print guide to inexpensive wines. Our first edition was released the year before the publication of Parker's Wine Bargains, and our second

Discovering the Language of Wine Reviews: A Text Mining Account

The results show that wine experts do share a common vocabulary to describe wines and they use this in a consistent way, which makes it possible to automatically predict wine characteristics based on the review text alone, which means that odors and flavors may be more expressible in language than typically acknowledged.

References

SHOWING 1-2 OF 2 REFERENCES

Critical Exposure and Price-Quality Relationships for New World Wines in the U.S. Market*

Abstract Notwithstanding the observed positive correlations between critics' quality ratings and wine prices, the range of these correlations is quite high. In light of this, researchers must

On Bullshit, Princeton

  • 2005