On Multiple Wh -Fronting

@article{Bokovi2002OnMW,
  title={On Multiple Wh -Fronting},
  author={Željko Bo{\vs}kovi{\'c}},
  journal={Linguistic Inquiry},
  year={2002},
  volume={33},
  pages={351 - 383}
}
I show that multiple wh-fronting languages (MWFL) do not behave uniformly regarding wh-movement and eliminate MWFL from the crosslinguistic typology concerning wh-movement in multiple questions. Regarding when they have wh-movement, MWFL behave like non-MWFL: some behave like English (they always have wh-movement), some like Chinese (they never have it), and some like French (they have it optionally although, as in French, wh-movement is sometimes required). MWFL differ from English, Chinese… Expand
Multiple Wh-Fronting
This article argues that overt multiple wh-fronting in languages like Bulgarian consists of moving a single wh-cluster to [Spec, CP]. The formation of wh-clusters is motivated by the assumption thatExpand
Wh-Scoping in Syntactic Wh-Fronting Languages
This paper examines various types of syntactic wh-fronting languages in order to offer a non-derivational account of wh-scoping in these languages. While English is commonly regarded as a typicalExpand
Focus Fronting in Wh-Questions in Inuktitut *
TLDR
It is shown that Inuktitut word order depends on the presence of topic/focus features, and that the preferred position for wh-words and focused constituents is below the subject and above the verb. Expand
Exclusivity! Wh-fronting is not optional wh-movement in Colloquial French
This article revisits the long-standing issue of the alternation between wh-in-situ and wh-ex-situ questions in French in the light of diglossia and cross-linguistic data. A careful preliminaryExpand
Ellipsis in sequences of multiple wh-words
TLDR
It is proposed that elliptical multiple questions result from TP-deletion after movement of the wh-words into CP domain and the TP-ellipsis is driven by the Focus feature, which explains that it can also apply to referential focused DPs. Expand
On the morphosyntax of wh -movement
The central aim of this paper is to develop a general theory of wh-constructions which (i) allows us to accurately distinguish between wh-phrases as question-word phrases, echo-question phrases andExpand
Locality in Movement and Scope Interpretation ofIn-Situ Wh-Phrases
TLDR
It is suggested that both wh-movement and wh-scrambling uniformly are motivated by an optional edge feature that marks specificity or definiteness when present, and the correlation between superiority effects in whmovement and head movement in head-final languages (e.g. Korean and Japanese) is explored. Expand
Basque-Spanish Language Contact : an empirical study on word order in interrogatives
Basque and Spanish are two typological very different languages. Nevertheless, they show surprisingly similar word order restrictions in wh-interrogatives. Both languages exhibit obligatoryExpand
What’s a wh-word got to do with it?
Cross-linguistic studies on question formation suggest that yes/no-questions and wh-questions have different syntax even though they may appear to share certain morphosyntactic properties, such asExpand
Multiple wh -fronting in Serbo-Croatian matrix questions and the matrix sluicing construction
TLDR
An attempt to find an answer to this question will reveal that there is a parallelism between Wh-phrases and identificationally focused material (in the sense of E. Kiss 1998) with respect to the positions they occupy in the sentence. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 90 REFERENCES
Multiple Wh-Fronting
This article argues that overt multiple wh-fronting in languages like Bulgarian consists of moving a single wh-cluster to [Spec, CP]. The formation of wh-clusters is motivated by the assumption thatExpand
On multiple questions and multiple WH fronting
Concluding SummaryMy goals in this article have been to describe two types of multiple-Wh-fronting languages and to integrate them into a general typology of Wh-movement andExpand
On the Typology of Wh-Questions
This paper examines some representative examples of wh-question, and argues, contra Shima (1999), that the typological differences in wh-questions should not be attributed to the language-specificExpand
Phrasal Movement and Its Kin
This study investigates the types of movement and movement-like relations that link positions in syntactic structure. David Pesetsky argues that there are three such relations. Besides overt phasalExpand
Superiority effects with multiple wh-fronting in Serbo-Croatian
TLDR
The analysis presented in the paper provides evidence that, in certain well-defined configurations, lexical insertion is possible in LF and that feature movement is subject to locality constraints on movement. Expand
Licensing Wh‐in‐situ
This article examines French wh-in-situ. We argue that wh-in-situ in French is licensed by an intonation morpheme, which also licenses yes/no questions. Movement of a Q-feature of an in-situ wh-wordExpand
On the interpretation of multiple questions
The paper shows that crosslinguistically, overt movement of a wh-phrase to SpecCP results in the loss of the single-pair interpretation for multiple questions, i.e. it forces the pair-listExpand
Wh-Scope Marking
1. Introduction (by Lutz, Uli) 2. Wh-Scope Marking: Direct vs. Indirect Dependency (by Beck, Sigrid) 3. Scope Marking and Calusal Typing (by Brandner, Ellen) 4. Moving Just the Feature (by Cheng,Expand
Restructuring, head movement, and locality
This article presents a novel account of the well-known restructuring phenomenon of the Romance languages, concentrating on Italian. I argue that it is possible to retain the benefits of anExpand
On wh -islands and obligatory wh -movement contexts in South Slavic
The goal of this paper is to examine Wh-islands effects in Bulgarian and Serbo-Croatian (SC) and constructions in which SC must have Wh-movement. The starting point will be Rudin’s (1988) seminalExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...