On Individual Differences in Person Perception: Raters’ Personality Traits Relate to Their Psychopathy Checklist-Revised Scoring Tendencies

  title={On Individual Differences in Person Perception: Raters’ Personality Traits Relate to Their Psychopathy Checklist-Revised Scoring Tendencies},
  author={Audrey K. Miller and Katrina A Rufino and Marcus T. Boccaccini and Rebecca L. Jackson and Daniel C. Murrie},
  pages={253 - 260}
This study investigated raters’ personality traits in relation to scores they assigned to offenders using the Psychopathy Checklist—Revised (PCL-R). A total of 22 participants, including graduate students and faculty members in clinical psychology programs, completed a PCL-R training session, independently scored four criminal offenders using the PCL-R, and completed a comprehensive measure of their own personality traits. A priori hypotheses specified that raters’ personality traits, and their… 

Tables from this paper

Influence of Personality on Individuals' Ratings of Psychopathy

This study examined the impact of personality characteristics of individual raters on the scoring of the PCL-R to determine if individuals who endorsed psychopathic personality characteristics would

Self- and Informant-Perceptions of Psychopathic Traits: Do Attitudes Predict Behavior Beyond Personality Ratings?

Recent empirical evidence suggests that psychopathic individuals are capable of accurately self-reporting on their personality style and externalizing behaviors; however, little is known about their

Evaluator differences in Psychopathy Checklist-Revised factor and facet scores.

Findings provide indirect but positive support for the benefits of PCL-R training, but also suggest that evaluator differences may be evident to some extent in many field settings, even among trained evaluators.

Bold, smart, dangerous and evil: perceived correlates of core psychopathic traits among jury panel members.

An ethnically diverse sample of 285 US community members attending jury duty reviewed a case vignette regarding a capital murder trial and ratings of psychopathy pertaining to the defendant were strongly associated with ratings on measures of his perceived boldness, intelligence, violence potential, and perceptions that he was 'evil'.

Rater differences in psychopathy measure scoring and predictive validity.

Data from the MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study was used to examine whether there were rater differences in psychopathy measure scoring and predictive effects among trained raters in a rigorous research context and found that mean differences in scoring have implications for score interpretation.

Examining the Interrater Reliability of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised Across a Large Sample of Trained Raters

Assessment of interrater reliability of the Psychopathy Checklist—Revised among a large sample of trained raters found that despite low reliability estimates for individual items, Total scores and factor scores can be reliably scored amongtrained raters.

Interrater Reliability of Psychopathy Checklist–Revised: Results on Multiple Analysis Levels for a Sample of Patients Undergoing Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation

Scores from the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL-R) are used to support decisions regarding personal liberty. In our study, performed in an applied forensic psychiatric setting, intraclass

Field Inter-Rater Reliability of the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised

Results of this study show that the reliability of PCL-R scores in field settings can be comparable to those in research settings, and highlight the importance of training, consultation, considering different scores for a given item, following the guidelines of the manual.

Jury panel member perceptions of interpersonal-affective traits of psychopathy predict support for execution in a capital murder trial simulation.

Remorselessness predicted death verdicts, as did the affective and interpersonal features of psychopathy - though the latter effect was more pronounced among jurors who were Caucasian and/or who described their political beliefs as moderate rather than conservative or liberal.

Exploring the Relationship Between Raters’ Personality Traits and Rating Severity in Writing Assessment of Chinese as a Second Language: A Pilot Study

Subjective rating is a widely adopted practice in human assessment and measurement. Without a careful control of severity among raters in grading, both the validity and reliability of a subjective



Inter-rater reliability of the PCL-R total and factor scores among psychopathic sex offenders: are personality features more prone to disagreement than behavioral features?

Despite considerable support for the inter-rater reliability of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist--Revised (PCL-R; Hare, 1991, 2003) in research contexts, there is increasing concern that scores from

DO SOME EVALUATORS REPORT CONSISTENTLY HIGHER OR LOWER PCL-R SCORES THAN OTHERS? Findings From a Statewide Sample of Sexually Violent Predator Evaluations

This study examined whether some evaluators tend to report consistently higher or lower scores than other evaluators for offenders on the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R; R. D. Hare, 1991,

Factors of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory

Regression-based equations for the clinical assessment of these psychopathy dimensions using the NEO Personality Inventory—Revised (NEO-PI-R) are reported, consistent with movements toward assessing personality disorder using the five-factor model.

Personality disorders as extreme variants of common personality dimensions: can the Five-Factor Model adequately represent psychopathy?

The results support the contention that psychopathy can be understood as an extreme variant of common dimensions of personality, and underscore the utility of a dimensional model of personality disorders.

Personality in adulthood: a six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory.

The data support the position that personality is stable after age 30 and show evidence of small declines in Activity, Positive Emotions, and openness to Actions that might be attributed to maturation, but none of these effects was replicated in sequential analyses.

Does Interrater (Dis)agreement on Psychopathy Checklist Scores in Sexually Violent Predator Trials Suggest Partisan Allegiance in Forensic Evaluations?

All 43 sexual-offender civil-commitment trials in one state were reviewed and identified 23 cases in which opposing evaluators reported PCL-R total scores for the same individual, raising concerns about the potential for a forensic evaluator’s “partisan allegiance” to influence PCl-R scores in adversarial proceedings.

The role and relevance of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in court: A case law survey of U.S. courts (1991-2004).

The Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL–R; R. D. Hare, 1991, 2003) is the most empirically validated instrument for measuring psychopathy in correctional and forensic psychiatric populations. The

A Large-Scale Meta-Analysis Relating the Hare Measures of Psychopathy to Antisocial Conduct

Results indicated that higher PCL Total, Factor 1 (F1), and Factor 2 (F2) scores were moderately associated with increased antisocial conduct, and multiple regression analyses indicated that the information used to assess psychopathy did not have a unique influence on effect sizes after accounting for the influence of other moderator variables.

Handbook of Personality Assessment

Preface. I. Basic Considerations. 1. History of personality assessment. Early Events. Emergence of Personality Psychology. World War II and the Expansion of Clinical Psychology. Trends Over Time:

Rater (dis)agreement on risk assessment measures in sexually violent predator proceedings: Evidence of adversarial allegiance in forensic evaluation?

Actuarial risk assessment measures are often admitted in court, partly because strong psychometric properties such as interrater agreement suggest that they increase reliability and reduce