On Computing Explanations in Abstract Argumentation

@inproceedings{Fan2014OnCE,
  title={On Computing Explanations in Abstract Argumentation},
  author={Xiuyi Fan and Francesca Toni},
  booktitle={ECAI},
  year={2014}
}
Argumentation can be viewed as a process of generating explanations. We propose a new argumentation semantics, related admissibility, for closely capturing explanations in Abstract Argumentation, and distinguish between compact and verbose explanations. We show that dispute forests, composed of dispute trees, can be used to correctly compute these explanations. 

Topics from this paper.

Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 16 CITATIONS

On Computing Explanations for Non-Acceptable Arguments

VIEW 4 EXCERPTS
CITES BACKGROUND
HIGHLY INFLUENCED

On Explanations for Non-Acceptable Arguments

VIEW 4 EXCERPTS
CITES BACKGROUND
HIGHLY INFLUENCED

Computing Argument Preferences and Explanations in Abstract Argumentation

  • 2018 IEEE 30th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI)
  • 2018
VIEW 1 EXCERPT
CITES METHODS

A probabilistic logic for multi-source heterogeneous information fusion

  • 2017 IEEE International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems (MFI)
  • 2017
VIEW 1 EXCERPT
CITES METHODS

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-4 OF 4 REFERENCES

The Rationality of Science

W. H. Newton-Smith
  • Routledge
  • 1981
VIEW 3 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL