Of Mice and Men: Equality and Animals

  title={Of Mice and Men: Equality and Animals},
  author={Peter Vallentyne},
  journal={The Journal of Ethics},
  • P. Vallentyne
  • Published 1 October 2005
  • Sociology
  • The Journal of Ethics
Can material Egalitarianism (requiring, for example, the significant promotion of fortune) include animals in the domain of the equality requirement? The problem can be illustrated as follows: If equality of wellbeing is what matters, and normal mice are included in this egalitarian requirement, then normal mice have a much stronger claim to resources than almost any human. This is because normal mice have a much stronger claim to resources than almost any human. This is because their wellbeing… 
Equality, Priority and Nonhuman Animals*
This paper assesses the implications of egali- tarianism and prioritarianism for the consideration of nonhuman animals. These implications have been often overlooked. The paper argues that neither
Human-animal amity and reciprocity
Animals are now widely accepted as subjects of justice: not equal but deserving equal consideration; not free but deserving liberties (that is, self- constraining human duties). But liberty and
Egalitarianism and Animals
The moral consideration of nonhuman animals and the critique of speciesism have been defended by appeal to a variety of ethical theories. One of the main approaches in moral and political philosophy
The Concept of Nature in Libertarianism
  • M. Wissenburg
  • Philosophy, Sociology
    Ethics, Policy & Environment
  • 2019
ABSTRACT Libertarians are not famed as friends of nature – but is that a matter of principle? I examine consequentialist, deontological and teleological versions of left- and right-libertarianism on
Expanding Global Justice: The Case for the International Protection of Animals
This article examines and rejects the view that nonhuman animals cannot be recipients of justice, and argues that the main reasons in favor of universal human rights and global justice also apply in
Egalitarianism with a human face
My thesis vindicates the ideal of egalitarianism with a human face by answering the threefold challenge that contemporary egalitarians fail to capture what really matters when it comes to
The lion and the lamb: ecological implications of Martha Nussbaum's animal ethics
Martha Nussbaum's translation of her list of human capabilities into one for animals is based on controversial assumptions and results in controversial prescriptions. Here one of Nussbaum's arguments
All Animals are Equal, but Some More than Others?
Does the moral badness of pain depend on who feels it? A common, but generally only implicitly stated view, is that it does not. This view, ‘unitarianism’, maintains that the same interests of
Equality, priority and global justice
Derek Parfit has argued that prioritarianism “naturally” has global scope, i.e. naturally applies to everyone, irrespective of his or her particular national, state or other communal affiliation. In
The lion and the lamb 1 Wider implications of Martha Nussbaum's animal ethics
Martha Nussbaum’s recent attempts to translate her list of human capabilities into one for animals contain many quite controversial assumptions and prescriptions. If one takes her arguments to their


Equality, Priority, and Compassion*
In recent years there has been a good deal of discussion of equality’s place in the best account of distribution or distributive justice. One central question has been whether egalitarianism should
Equality of what: Welfare, resources, or capabilities?
THE TARGET OF EGALITARIAN CONCERNS Many of us have egalitarian concerns. To some extent, that is, at some cost, we prefer a world in which goods - powers, liberties, opportunities, wealth, health -
Speciesism and the argument from misfortune
Is there a morally relevant difference between a brain-damaged human being and a nonhuman animal at the same cognitive and emotional level to justify, say, performing medical experiments on the
All humans have an equal basic moral status. They possess the same fundamental rights, and the comparable interests of each person should count the same in calculations that determine social policy.
If there is one thing we share as members of the human family it is that what and who we most basically are is a matter of chance, not choice. Our parents have gambled in the genetic lottery and the
The ethics of killing : problems at the margins of life
This magisterial work is the first comprehensive study of the ethics of killing, where the moral status of the individual is uncertain or controversial. Drawing on philosophical notions of personal
From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice
1. Introduction 2. Eugenics and its shadow 3. Genes, justice, and human nature 4. Positive and negative genetic interventions 5. Reproductive freedom and the prevention of harm 6. Why not the best?
Created from Animals: The Moral Implications of Darwinism
Darwin's discovery how evolution and ethics might be related must a Darwinian be sceptical about religion? how different are humans from other animals? morality without the idea that humans are
Cognitive Disability, Misfortune, and Justice
Les etres humains different cruellement dans les dons que la nature leur fait et ces inegalites peuvent affecter leur mode de vie. Fort de cette constatation, l'A. propose une reflexion sur le lien
Creation ethics: the moral status of early fetuses and the ethics of abortion.
  • E. Harman
  • Philosophy, Medicine
    Philosophy & public affairs
  • 1999
Designant par la notion de jeune foetus l'embryon tel qu'il ne possede pas encore les proprietes intrinseques qui lui conferent le statut moral de foetus, l'A. entreprend une revision du debat