Occupational Therapy for Prosthetic Rehabilitation in Adults with Acquired Upper-Limb Loss: Body-Powered and Myoelectric Control Systems

  title={Occupational Therapy for Prosthetic Rehabilitation in Adults with Acquired Upper-Limb Loss: Body-Powered and Myoelectric Control Systems},
  author={Liselotte M. N. Hermansson and Kristi L. Turner},
  journal={Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics},
&NA; There is uncertainty as to whether occupational therapy differs between patients fitted with upper-limb prostheses using different control systems. The aim was to describe occupational therapy in upper-limb prosthetic rehabilitation and discuss potential differences in therapy between patients fitted with body-powered or myoelectric control systems. An overview and description of occupational therapy methods for upper-limb prosthetic rehabilitation is provided based on literature and… 
1 Citations
Training for users of myoelectric multigrip hand prostheses: a scoping review
Existing training instructions for using multigrip prosthetic hands are inadequate, providing poor guidance to clinicians and insufficient training for patients, and further research is needed into the efficiency of various training methods.


Differences in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb prostheses: Systematic literature review.
There is a lack of empirical evidence regarding functional differences in upper-limb prostheses, and evidence is insufficient to conclude that either system provides a significant general advantage.
Learning to use a body-powered prosthesis: changes in functionality and kinematics
Training action-perception couplings of body-powered prosthesis in basic tasks transferred to functional tasks and this lasted after a period of non-use and it is advisable to start body- powered training with indirect grasping tasks but also to practice hook-object orientations.
The Use of Preparatory/Evaluation/Training Prostheses in Developing Evidenced-Based Practice in Upper Limb Prosthetics
This article will present an alternative approach to meeting the need for objective clinical documentation by using case-specific methodology that involves the routine use of temporary prostheses, which have historically been used to prepare, evaluate, and train amputees to develop successful functional outcomes.
Patient Training for Functional Use of Pattern Recognition–Controlled Prostheses
The training stages are described, with relevant case studies, and several tools that can be used throughout the training process are highlighted, including prosthesis-guided training—a self-initiated, simple method of recalibrating a pattern recognition–controlled prosthesis.
Occupational therapy protocol for amputees with targeted muscle reinnervation.
The procedure is described, the protocol for postoperative, preprosthetic care is presented, and a guide to patient training using standard-of-care prosthetic devices controlled by up to four intuitive, independent, and isolated myoelectric signals is recommended.
Managing the upper extremity amputee: a protocol for success.
A five-phased upper extremity amputee protocol of care was developed and seeks to offer insight into the ideal treatment of an individual withupper extremity limb loss based on experience and collective expertise of the authoring therapists.
Influence of standardized activities on validity of Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control.
Evidence is provided for the validity of the ACMC across the standardized activities and in prosthesis users of both sexes and prosthetic sides and the newly standardized activities are recommended.
Immediate, early, and late postsurgical management of upper-limb amputation.
All upper-limb amputees should be fitted as rapidly as possible with conventional prosthetic devices, and when they have shown motivation and skill in the use of conventional devices, then to re-evaluate them for appropriate externally powered prosthetic components.
Development and measurement properties of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS): A comprehensive set of clinical outcome instruments
The Orthotic and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS) is a promising self-report instrument which may, with further development, allow orthotic and prosthetic practitioners to evaluate the quality and effectiveness of their services as required by accreditation standards such as those of the American Board for Certification in Orthotics andprosthetics that mandate quality assessment.