Objective spatial coding by 6.5‐month‐old infants in a visual dishabituation task

@article{Kaufman1999ObjectiveSC,
  title={Objective spatial coding by 6.5‐month‐old infants in a visual dishabituation task},
  author={Jordy Kaufman and Amy Needham},
  journal={Developmental Science},
  year={1999},
  volume={2},
  pages={432-441}
}
Forty 6.5-month-old infants were tested in a visual dishabituation variation of Bremner and Bryant’s reaching task used to evaluate the spatial representations of infants. In the visual dishabituation version of this task, infants were habituated to a display in which an object held a constant position at a corner of the table. Following habituation, the object was either moved to the opposite table-corner or nothing on the table was changed. Also, the infant either remained in her starting… 

Figures from this paper

Spatial expectations of young human infants, following passive movement.
TLDR
The findings presented here indicate that with enough experience, young infants become aware of key spatial relationships in their environment during passive movement.
Development of allocentric spatial recall from new viewpoints in virtual reality.
TLDR
There is a major qualitative change in coding for spatial recall around the fourth birthday, potentially followed by further development towards fully flexible recall from new viewpoints.
Four-Year-Olds Use a Mixture of Spatial Reference Frames
TLDR
This paper uses a modelling approach to re-examine the data and distinguish three possible strategies that could lead to the previous results at four years, and suggests that children become both more reliant on the correct frame and more accurate with any chosen frame as they mature.
The Effect of Simulated Self Versus Object Movement in a Nonsearch Task.
  • M. Schmuckler, S. Jewell
  • Psychology
    Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
  • 2007
TLDR
6-month-old infants' abilities to use the visual information provided by simulated self-movement through the world, and movement of an object through the World, for spatial orientation are examined, emphasizing the availability and use of spatial information.
Frame of reference for visual perception in young infants during change of body position
TLDR
Results suggest that changes in body position from lying to upright produced incongruence of the egocentric and allocentric reference frames for perception of dynamic visual displays and that infants may rely more on the Egocentric reference frame.
Encoding the goal of an object-directed but uncompleted reaching action in 6- and 9-month-old infants.
TLDR
6-month-olds are already able to infer the goal of an uncompleted action without seeing the achievement of the goal itself, however, they encoded thegoal of the reaching action only when it was presented from an allocentric perspective but not from an egocentric perspective.
Frames of reference for anticipatory action in 4-month-old infants.
Components of spatial memory : a developmental analysis
TLDR
These patterns provide evidence that cognitive and neural substrates for spatial memory are dissociable in development, and that children's early spatial errors can be explained by differential rates of maturation for different substrates of spatial representation.
Recognition of complex object-centred spatial configurations in early infancy
In a series of experiments we tested 4- and 8-month-olds’ ability to represent the spatial layout of an object across changes in its orientation with respect to egocentric spatial coordinates. A
Spatial localization of touch in the first year of life: early influence of a visual spatial code and the development of remapping across changes in limb position.
TLDR
The authors argue that there is an early visual influence on tactile spatial perception and suggest that the ability to remap visual and manual directional responses across changes in posture develops between 6.5 and 10 months, most likely because of the experience of crossing the midline gained during this period.
...
1
2
3
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 23 REFERENCES
Spatial errors made by infants: inadequate spatial cues or evidence of egocentrism?
Nine month old infants search correctly for an object which they have seen hidden in one position, but cease to do so after they have been moved to the opposite side of the display, searching instead
Egocentric Versus Allocentric Spatial Coding in Nine-Month-Old Infants: Factors Influencing the Choice of Code
Presented 32 9-mo-old infants with a problem in which they saw an object hidden in 1 of 2 places but were prevented from searching for it until after the spatial relationship between infant and
Spatial orientation of six-month-old infants.
TLDR
According to this study, 6-month-olds can encode a location relative to a landmark, but in many situations their visual search behavior is dominated by the learned egocentric code.
Response versus place learning by human infants.
TLDR
It is suggested that the decrease in infant egocentricity in such spatial localization tasks may in fact reflect an age-related increase in the variety of reliable cues responded to by infants.
Place versus response as the basis of spatial errors made by young infants.
Spatial localization in infancy: position constancy in a square and circular room with and without a landmark.
The ability of 8-month-old infants to localize an event from a new direction of facing was tested in a square and a circular room with and without a landmark. Subjects were trained to anticipate the
Geometric Complexity and Object Search in Infancy
In four experiments we investigated the role of geometric path type in infants' ability to make spatial inferences about the location of a hidden object after they themselves had been moved through
Locus of Habituation in the Human Newborn
TLDR
It is suggested that the habituation effects and the subsequent novelty preferences found in the experiments are most reasonably interpreted as a function of memory formation, and evidence is presented for the storage of visual experience from birth.
Egocentric Action in Early Infancy: Spatial Frames of Reference for Saccades
TLDR
It is shown that infants depend on a simple retinocentric representation at age 4 months, but by 6 months use egocentric representations more often to control saccade planning, which may index maturation in cortical circuitry devoted to visual spatial processing in general.
...
1
2
3
...