Objective comparison of subtotal vs. total abdominal hysterectomy regarding pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial with 14-year follow-up.

@article{Andersen2015ObjectiveCO,
  title={Objective comparison of subtotal vs. total abdominal hysterectomy regarding pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial with 14-year follow-up.},
  author={Lea Laird Andersen and Lars Mikael Alling M{\o}ller and Helga Margrethe Gimbel},
  journal={European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology},
  year={2015},
  volume={193},
  pages={
          40-5
        }
}
OBJECTIVE To compare subtotal and total abdominal hysterectomy regarding objective assessment of pelvic organ prolapse, urinary incontinence and voiding function 14 years after hysterectomy for benign diseases. STUDY DESIGN Long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of subtotal vs. total abdominal hysterectomy with objective outcomes. All randomized women still alive and living in Denmark (n=304) were invited to answer a questionnaire and come for clinical examination consisting of 20… CONTINUE READING
BETA

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-8 OF 8 CITATIONS

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 30 REFERENCES

Removing the cervix at hysterectomy: an unnecessary intervention?

  • Obstetrics and gynecology
  • 2009
VIEW 5 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

Validation of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 and the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 in Danish women with pelvic organ prolapse

U Due, S Brostrom, G. Lose
  • Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
  • 2013
VIEW 3 EXCERPTS

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…