• Corpus ID: 233033468

Objective Bayesian meta-analysis based on generalized multivariate random effects model

@inproceedings{Bodnar2021ObjectiveBM,
  title={Objective Bayesian meta-analysis based on generalized multivariate random effects model},
  author={Olha Bodnar and Taras Bodnar},
  year={2021}
}
Objective Bayesian inference procedures are derived for the parameters of the multivariate random effects model generalized to elliptically contoured distributions. The posterior for the overall mean vector and the between-study covariance matrix is deduced by assigning two noninformative priors to the model parameter, namely the Berger and Bernardo reference prior and the Jeffreys prior, whose analytical expressions are obtained under weak distributional assumptions. It is shown that the only… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 67 REFERENCES

NON-INFORMATIVE BAYESIAN INFERENCE FOR HETEROGENEITY IN A GENERALIZED MARGINAL RANDOM EFFECTS META-ANALYSIS

In this paper an objective Bayesian inference is proposed for the heterogeneity parameter in a generalized marginal random effects model. Models of this kind are widely used in meta-analysis and in

Bayesian estimation in random effects meta‐analysis using a non‐informative prior

TLDR
A recently proposed Bayesian estimation procedure is described and compared with a profile likelihood method and with the DerSimonian-Laird and Mandel-Paule estimators including the Knapp-Hartung correction to reveal that the Bayesian approach is a promising alternative producing more accurate interval estimates than those three conventional procedures for meta-analysis.

Flexible parametric models for random‐effects distributions

TLDR
It is concluded that inferences regarding the random effects can crucially depend on the assumptions made and recommend using a distribution, such as those suggested here, which is more flexible than the normal.

A matrix-based method of moments for fitting the multivariate random effects model for meta-analysis and meta-regression

TLDR
A new multivariate method of moments for estimating the between-study covariance matrix that allows for either complete or incomplete outcomes and it allows for covariates through meta-regression, and is invariant to linear transformations.

Bayesian multivariate meta‐analysis with multiple outcomes

TLDR
A separation prior is employed for the between-study variance-covariance matrix, which offers an improvement on the conventional inverse-Wishart prior, showing robustness in estimation and flexibility in incorporating prior information.

Random-Effects Meta-analysis of Inconsistent Effects: A Time for Change

TLDR
The decision to calculate a summary estimate in a meta-analysis should be based on clinical judgment, the number of studies, and the degree of variation among studies, as well as on a random-effects model that incorporates study-to-study variability beyond what would be expected by chance.

A Method of Moments Estimator for Random Effect Multivariate Meta‐Analysis

TLDR
A noniterative method of moments estimator for the between-study covariance matrix in the random effect model multivariate meta-analysis, which is the first such method of Moments estimator in the matrix form to be developed.

Objective Bayesian Inference for a Generalized Marginal Random Effects Model

TLDR
The frequentist properties of the proposed inference for the generalized marginal random effects model are investigated through simulations, and its robustness when the underlying distributional assumptions are violated is studied.

Methods to calculate uncertainty in the estimated overall effect size from a random‐effects meta‐analysis

TLDR
This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of available methods for calculating point estimates, confidence intervals, and prediction intervals for the overall effect size under the random‐effects model, and indicates whether some methods are preferable than others by considering the results of comparative simulation and real‐life data studies.

Multivariate meta‐analysis

TLDR
This paper proposes and evaluates three Bayesian multivariate meta-analysis models: two multivariate analogues of the traditional univariate random effects models which make different assumptions about the relationships between studies and estimates, and a multivariaterandom effects model which is a Bayesian adaptation of the mixed model approach.
...